SXSW Japan Nite: Kaori’s etherial petals
It’s not often that I have a favorite photograph from a photography session or an event. Typically, I may have a dozen or so selects. Luckily, I was able to attend the 2013 SXSW Japan Nite last Friday and this photograph is my favorite. I shot about 800 photos and narrowed my choices down to about 100. This particular image still bubbles to the top. Of course, it’s from my favorite group, Kao=S. While Kaori, the lead performer, is known for some dynamic and aggressive samurai sword performances, this scene with the cherry blossom petals is quite the opposite.
I wish I can say that I can nail this kind of photo all the time but I do admit there is a certain amount of luck and good timing to these things. I didn’t know she was going to blow the petals and I just happen to be there to catch it and with a good expression. I think the color and light works well and the wispy, motion blurred petals have an etherial quality.
While good timing is key, having the right camera settings also help. Here’s how I got the shot. I used my Olympus E-PM2 with the Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 lens. The real star, equipment wise, was the little Olympus FL-300R flash. It’s a really compact flash that runs on two AAA batteries and is properly scaled to the small Olympus Pen bodies. I dialed in a really light -2 1/3 flash exposure compensation. This allowed me to add just a touch of fill on the subject while preserving much of the colorful stage lighting. I used ISO 800 and at f1.4 which gave me 1/160 second shutter.
Like last year, I also used my Canon 7D with the 50mm f1.4 lens but the Olympus Pen really hit its stride this year. I use the older Olympus E-PL1 and the 20mm f1.7 lens last year, with no flash. The images were usable but nothing special. This year’s Pen setup was dramatically better and in some ways bested the results from the 7D. Quite surprising, actually. I’ll talk about how the two cameras compared at Japan Nite, in an upcoming post. Please stay tuned.
Click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure detail.
Japan Preview Show: Experiencing Kao=S again
My favorite group from last year’s Japan Nite, Kao=S, was playing again this year. I wasn’t sure if I could make it to this year’s Japan Nite so I decided to go to the preview show on Thursday afternoon. Luckily Kao=S was the last group playing so I headed down there after work at about 6pm. The Japan preview show is a great, free alternative to the main show which is restricted to people of drinking age. It happens during the daytime and people of all ages are welcome.
This year, the performance was at The Grackle on 6th Street on the east side of town. I don’t get to this part of town often and naively assumed that parking would be a breeze. I was dead wrong. The parking situation is worse than downtown in this mostly residential area. I was lucky to find a tight spot 8 blocks away. The glass shards from multiple car break-ins gave me pause but I wasn’t going to stay late.
My timing couldn’t be more perfect. The 2nd to last band was finishing up and Kao=S was prepping the stage. I was pleasantly surprised when the band members recognized me from last year. Apparently, they really liked the photos I shot of them, which you can see on this blog post, Kao=S at SXSW Japan Nite, Original and Spectacular. On that post, I talk about why I like this group so much. They fuse Japanese instruments and culture in a modern context and it’s also a very theatrical show.
Unlike the dark indoor venues which require high ISOs and/or flash, this was an outdoor event in bright light, on a small stage, setup under an open sided tent. I thought that it would be easy to make great photos but I was completely wrong. A couple of things conspired against me. By 6:30, the sun’s warm rays were streaming under the tent, creating uneven harsh shadows. Using a flash tamed the shadows somewhat but not enough to make high quality shots. There was also a lot of background clutter. The jumble of chain link fences, people and the East Austin Neighborhood didn’t give me that clean look that I was hoping for.
My conversion to black and white solved several problems. The uneven color from the sun, the harsh shadows and even the background clutter were all tamed by my monochromes. I also think this gives a more photojournalist look. This use of black and white also nicely coincides with my recent interest which I talk about in SXSW Photowalk: A black and white exploration.
Finally, as the sun dipped below the horizon and with the harsh rays safely tucked away, I ask the band if I could make a portrait. I shot several of the band and of Kaori, the lovely lead performer. With the lighting under control and the background somewhat simplified, I made satisfactory color photographs. A nice ending to a busy work week and I’m happy to report that my car was safely waiting for me, unscathed.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
SXSW Photowalk: Google Glass spotted
The SXSW Photowalk I’ve been talking about was sponsored by Google. They gave out some swag, I got a microfiber cloth and a LED flashlight. Something that made even a bigger splash were a couple of people who sported that latest tech. Google Glass is a wearable computer, voice activated and still in beta. You will notice that these two women are wearing the computer on their face. The plastic piece attached to their “Glasses” on the right side of their face. It has a built-in camera and probably loads of other features that I don’t know.
The first photo features the latest in tech. In addition to Nicole’s Google Glass, she is also looking at a Lytro, light field camera. Just part of the nerd-like fun at these SXSW Interactive Photowalks. We didn’t get to use the Google Glass, so I can’t give you a first hand account. I’m interested in trying it but I’m uncertain about using it myself. It’s one thing to have attractive women sporting these devices but for me, not so much. I need to be decreasing my nerdiness, and I’m not sure if this device will help my case.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
SXSW Photowalk: 6th and Congress sparkles
A mass of 200 – 250 people stormed through Austin last night with cameras in hand. We organized at City Hall and took a zig zag pattern though downtown. Yes, I attended the SXSW Photowalk organized by Trey Ratcliff, yesterday. As the group moved, we spread out into smaller clumps, occasionally regrouping as we travelled through the colorful entertainment districts. Why so many photographers? Was there a celebrity nearby? People were either confused or accepted that maybe this was just another wacky SXSW stunt.
I reached the corner of 6th and Congress Avenue at the peak of blue hour. I popped open my lightweight tripod topped with the Olympus E-PM2 and the 14m with wide-angle adapter. My camera was pre-set perfectly for HDRs, set to manual focus, ISO 200 and a deep aperture. I shot several brackets, this one, my favorite.
The streets were busy, the trees sparked and the Frost Tower shined. The mid-60′s temperatures tricked visitors into thinking that Austin is perfect — just wait until summer. But for now SXSW is in full swing. Interactive winds down as the music spins up. 4 days gone, 6 more to go.
More photos to come…
Click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure detail.
Precision Camera Transforms
Precision Camera, the only remaining full service camera store in Austin opened a brand new, shiny store last week. Actually they moved from their old store to a new location 4 miles north on Anderson Lane. And what a difference. The old place was cramped and dark. The new place is light, airy and upscale, in a friendly and accessible way. The showroom is at least 2 1/2 times larger and now located in a place with ample parking.
I walked into their new digs last Saturday, a couple of days after the official opening. I saw Jerry Sullivan, the owner, and congratulated him. He was beaming like a proud Papa and he gave me tour of the entire place, including the back offices and the repair and print centers. The store now has the space for people to breath and congregate. Along the left side, a long counter with all the cameras available for personal demos. In the back left, a repair and equipment rental facility. To the back right, a comfortable lounge is positioned in front of a mini camera museum. And on the other side of the museum display, a 70 person classroom.
Jerry told me that traffic is up noticeably from the old location and, with all the additional space, you no longer feel like you are tripping over people or knocking into shelves. Gone is the dark cave like feeling, replaced by lots of natural light and natural wood tones. The place encourages people to linger and talk to other customers. And talk I did, for 2 1/2 hours. After Jerry’s tour, I ran into my friend, photographer and blogger, Kirk Tuck. We caught up for a while and even helped introduce the wonderful world of mirrorless to one of Kirk’s friends. Of course, Kirk was extolling the virtues of the Sony NEX line and I talked about my love for Micro 4/3.
It’s nice to live in a city with such a resource and I feel, more than ever, it will be the unofficial center of Austin’s photography world. If you live in the Austin area or visiting, you should stop by Precision Camera. Hope to see you there.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail. Multiply the focal length by 4.66 to get the 35mm equivalent
Seeing beyond the church at Mission San Jose
Mission San Jose is one of the 5 missions that are located in San Antonio, Texas. They were founded by the Spanish Missionaries in the late 18th century. While the Alamo is the most famous of the missions, Mission San Jose is known as the “Queen of the Missions” and is the most impressive.
I went there last week on a 4th grade class trip. While I did photograph the famous church itself, I was drawn to the bare trees that stood by the old mission walls. I love the structure of these “trees with character” and its contrast to the highly textured stone walls. I’m back on a HDR kick of sorts and I took my tripod and my Olympus E-PM2 to create these images.
I’ve been doing more HDRs recently for several reasons. First, it allows me to be deliberate, encouraging me to more precisely frame a photograph. Using a tripod, setting it up and waiting to take 3 exposures takes a bit more work than my recent free-form style. It’s not quite as exacting and precious as film but it does get me to slow down. Also, the look of HDRs is different with its simulated dynamic range and increased detail. I get a richness and color that a regular exposure does not produce. Finally, with my newest Olympus E-PM2, I now have a truly light weight setup that creates photos with, a no compromise, HDR quality. No need to lug my Canon 7D and bigger tripod with me.
This is my third time at this mission. On the first two occasions, I made the obvious photos. Multiple angles of the church exterior. The requisite shot down the middle aisle towards the altar. Sure, I shot those again, just in case. But I feel most proud of these alternate shots. The less obvious ones that perhaps not everyone would see. As I train my eye and improve as a photographer, I’m trying to create the less common photographs. Not totally unique, maybe, but something that breaks the “me too” mold. Not an easy task given that there are some many good photographers taking more photographs than ever.
Note: The last photograph is a black and white HDR. They don’t have to be in color and the HDR processing brings out more texture and detail. I didn’t like the color in this photo and the ground was much too cluttered and distracting. I found that the black and white conversion created a more compelling image.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
How technology has shifted from 4 years ago
I took the day off on Friday to go on a school field trip to San Antonio with my younger son. It’s an annual event for 4th graders and I went on the same trip with my older son 4 years ago. They went to the same two locations, the Mission San Jose and a museum called the Institute of Texan Cultures. I thought it would be interesting to compare the two trips, photographically, and primary from a technology point of view.
First, I noticed a big change in the type of cameras the parents used. It’s no secret that point and shoots are diminishing in popularity. Most every parent I saw shot with iPhones. The kids used iPods and inexpensive digital cameras, perhaps the hand-me-downs that the parents no longer use. I also saw only one DSLR on the entire trip. Four years ago there were many parents that used DSLRs and smaller dedicated cameras. Not a statistically significant sample but interesting none the less. A couple of parents even said that they had DSLRs but they were too heavy to bring on the trip.
You know that I have shifted away from DSLRs. A bit crazy and unwieldy but I brought 3 cameras with me. The Olympus E-P3 with the 25mm f1.4, the E-PM2 with the 14mm f2.5 and the Olympus XZ-1 point and shoot. My rational? I was going to do two distinctly different types of photography on the trip. I wanted to shoot casual, mostly candid pictures of the kids to share with rest of the class. I also wanted to shoot HDR urban landscapes on tripod. You can see a subtle HDR that I shot during the trip at an old Adobe house. I used the XZ-1 for the casual snaps, mainly outdoors. I used the E-P3 with the f1.4 lens indoors so that I didn’t have to use flash. The E-PM2 was attached to a tripod and acted as my “serious” landscape camera.
I just looked at my archives and discovered that I brought two DSLRs with me on this trip, four years ago. I used a Canon 20D with a 18-55mm kit lens and a Canon Rebel XT with a 70-210mm. Outdoors, I also used an external speedlite to tame the harsh sun. Indoors, I cranked the ISO up to 1600. Back then, I had no need for a tripod, I just shot people and didn’t do any urban landscapes. Today, even with three cameras and a tripod, I’m pretty sure my gear weighs less than it did back then.
I was surprised to see the XZ-1 point and shoot held its own, in daylight, compared to the DSLRs 4 years ago. The XZ-1 has a slight edge in resolution, 10MP vs the 8MP DSLRs. The DSLRs have a shallower DOF and more dynamic range, however I used a flash on both cameras outdoors and the resulting images were very similar. Using flash outdoors tends to soften harsh shadows and reduces the need for wide dynamic range. Of course I used fairly basic lenses on my DSLRs back then so I’m sure nicer glass would have tipped the quality balance towards the DSLRs. Back then I only shot JPEG, while now I use RAW. The RAW has the benefit of grabbing more detail and dynamic range in favor of the XZ-1.
Indoors, the DSLRs will run rings around the XZ-1, of course. But the Olympus E-P3 with the f1.4 lens holds its own and surpasses the Canon 20D and XT. Noise wise, the E-P3 has similar performance to these 2005 vintage DSLRs. The Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 lens however is clearly superior to the Canon kit lens. Ironically, I was getting shallower DOF with the Olympus and the 25mm, then with my Canon DSLR with the kit lens. The image quality of my newest Pen, the Olympus E-PM2 is even better than these DSLRs.
It appears that my candid and posed compositions of the kids were no worse and possibly better than it was 4 years ago. This is noteworthy since I rarely shoot these kinds of photos anymore. Back then, it was all that I did. Nowadays, I do a lot more city and urban photography. There are also changes in the way I shoot and post-process photographs. These days, I tend to expose darker and my photographs are a lot more colorful. The JPEGs that I shot back then were minimally processed and had dull appearance. Ironically, even though I now shoot exclusively in RAW, my colors are a lot more rich and vibrant. I attribute this mainly to my post processing that has evolved over the last several years.
Finally, I guess after years of practice, I now have the ability to shoot different kinds of photographs on the same outing. While I concentrated exclusively on candid, event type photography 4 years ago, I’ve added tripod based landscapes with HDR to my repertoire. It certainly keeps me busy and perhaps a bit goofy juggling multiple cameras, but it seems to work for me. I have little downtime and no dust, since I don’t have to change lenses. Since the cameras are so light and small, I’m not bogged down with a huge load of gear like a pack mule. I’m curious to see what I will be shooting with, 4 years from now.
Click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure detail.
2013 Chinese New Year Celebration in Austin
The Chinatown Center in North Austin had their annual Chinese New Year celebration yesterday. I wanted to do something different from last year, photographically, not creating the same type of photojournalistic pictures. I took a different set of cameras and lenses and forced myself to see details instead. It’s easy to take snapshots of the event but I struggled to make more artistic images. There are so many distractions, people, poles, and fences what take away from the photograph. My tactic, get closer or zoom in to reduce clutter. I don’t think I was entirely successful but it forced me to see things differently.
I took 3 compact cameras with me, leaving at home the Canon 7D that I used last year. I brought my Olympus E-P3 with the 25mm f1.4, the Olympus XZ-1 point and shoot and the 40-150mm zoom on the Olympus E-PM2. I mentioned on a recent post that the Olympus 40-150mm lens was on sale for $100 but I didn’t use the lens very often. I decided to give it a try yesterday, taking advantage of the 80mm to 300mm equivalent zoom, to get close. The lens performed a lot better than expected. And since I’m not typically a telephoto guy, it taxed my brain to create different kind of compositions. I ended up using this lens the most.
The XZ-1 worked well enough but I used it the least. There are several reasons for this. Switching between two cameras isn’t too bad but things get rather confusing for me when I added a third. The XZ-1 focuses moderately fast but both Olympus Pen cameras are faster so I tended to use them for action. With up to 300mm of zoom, I got more range than the maximum 112mm on the XZ-1. Finally, I noticed that the XZ-1′s LCD was not quite as bright as the Pens so shooting in bright sunlight was less ideal. So while to the XZ-1 might make a handy all around, one camera solution, given the choice, I still rather use my Pens.
Of course the highlight of the celebration was the Lion Dance and the firecrackers. With all the smoke and commotion, I found capturing images were a bit hit or miss. The 40-150mm lens did allow me to step back just a little to get out-of-the-way of the exploding firecrackers. I’m not sure I totally succeeded in my photographic goals but the big surprise was the performance of my infrequently used long zoom. The image quality of course does not match my Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4, but it’s surprisingly good. The lens is not very big or heavy considering is long telephoto range. Perhaps I need to take it out some more and play with its capabilities.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
Happy Holidays, See you next year
I took this photograph on 37th street near the University of Texas campus. It was during the Drink and Click photowalk that I talked about last week. The theme and contest challenge during the photowalk was “Bokeh”. This photo was going to be my entry — except I got a bit lazy and ran out of time so I’m posting it here.
Bokeh is a word frequently used by photographers, usually mispronounced and the meaning if often misunderstood. First of all, it is pronounced like Bo, sorta like Bo Jackson or Bo Derek, if you prefer. The second part is pronounced like Ke in the name Ken. It’s not Boka or Bokee. This Japanese world, in the context of photography means, the quality of the out of focus area. How good do the circle of lights look? Is the background harsh or smooth? It has nothing to do with depth of field (DOF) where some people call a photograph with a shallow DOF as having good bokeh.
I’m not a bokeh expert per say but from what I know this lens have very nice bokeh. I used the Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 (which is a 50mm equivalent on a 35mm) on my Olympus E-PM2. Notice that the out of focus lights are nearly, perfectly circular with a consistent fill. You don’t see a doughnut effect. There is also a smoothness to the light.
You may be interested to know that the worked bokeh, which should be properly spelled boke, is used frequently in Japan but not necessarily in the photographic context. It is used to mean fuzziness or forgetfulness. If one forgets something, they may say they are starting to Boke. Also if you say Boke Boke, that is a code word for senility or Alzheimer’s.
On that note, I like to wish my readers a very Happy Holiday. Thank you for coming back time and time again to read my blog — it means a lot. I have some ideas of where I’m taking this thing next year — some of which you are starting to see. I’m going on a family vacation to the East Coast so I probably won’t be posting here until next year. I will be posting photographs to mostlyfotos, my one photo per day site. Perhaps I may even post some photos from the road so that you can see where I’m visiting.
Have a Happy New Year!
Click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure detail.
Taco Cabana blue hour and capturing memories
About 20 years ago, I ate at my first Taco Cabana and my food world changed. I had just moved to Austin from the East Coast — my interest in Tex-Mex just starting. As you can imagine, the East Coast is no hotbed of Tex-Mex cuisine. Taco Bell was the only thing I could find back there and it was better than the sit down restaurant, Chi Chi’s. I was so taken with Taco Cabana’s food that I ate there twice a day for weeks on end.
Now, I still visit several times a month. Sure, there are better Tex-Mex restaurants in Austin, but as a fast food joint, Taco Cabana still does a nice, mostly consistent, job. Being a creature of habit, I have a happy hour margarita and bean and cheese nachos for 3 bucks before I go the my monthly photo user group meeting. At my last outing, my pre-user group meal coincided with blue hour. I took these photos to document a place that I have such fond, tasty memories.
The chain has gone through several remodels, with the latest happening recently. The food has pretty much stayed the same but the place has upgraded aesthetics and better service. The latest design has transformed this place into a modern and always colorful destination. Really for the price of a standard fast food burger, you can’t go wrong here. Plus, when is the last time you got margaritas and beer at your local McDonald’s.
I want to take more photos at everyday, mundane places. They are not breathtaking Grand Canyon vistas but arguably have more relevance to me. My small Olympus Pens really work in situations like this. I can shoot great quality photographs without looking strange or raising suspicions. Whipping out my DSLR just doesn’t feel right and a place with fond memories deserves more than a grainy point and shoot capture.
Click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
Flo Rida and the other Alex Suarez
It’s F1 weekend in Austin. After 5 years, Grand Prix motor racing has returned to the U.S. and it’s the talk of the town. With the onslaught of visitors, most Austinites I know are just trying to stay clear of the mess. I too was going to stay in the periphery until my friend Alex called. Hey, I have free access to the Flo Rida concert, are you in?
Alex just got the email confirmation and called me 2 hours before it started. Our challenge, how do we get downtown and find parking on F1 weekend? How about the train? The last stop was conveniently at the convention center were we needed to go. Without going into details. This is the second time I took the Capitol Metrorail train and it is the second time I was disappointed. Luckily, we made it downtown on time, at least.
My photographer friend, Alex Suarez just happens to share his name with the bass player for Cobra Starship, the opening act for Flo Rida. He got us VIP passes and even gave Alex a photo pass. Unfortunately, we didn’t know the details before we left and we opted not to bring our big gun cameras. Doh! We debated our equipment options but didn’t want to risk being turned away at the gate for bring in a “Pro” camera. I brought my Panasonic ZR1 point and shoot instead and at least Alex and I both had our iPhones.
The crowds were light and the concert started later than expected. I had plenty of time to shoot the pre-concert scenes. Alex and I were bummed that we missed our photo opportunity but we settled in and had a few drinks. They didn’t do any screening at least at the VIP entrance so I probably could have snuck in my Olympus Pen with a pancake lens… oh well. I challenged myself to do good photography with my humble point and shoot.
The performances were great and the music was loud. My ears rang slightly even with earplugs. As expected, Flo Rida was wilder than Cobra Starship. Towards the end little skirmishes broke out, nothing serious — the men had to calm the testosterone pumped women down. I don’t go to concerts often. And while Flo Rida wouldn’t be my first pick, I had a memorable time with some amazing access. I was 3 rows from the stage.
Photographically, it was a challenge. How do I take good quality photos with my Panasonic ZR1 and iPhone? It would been amazing to have my EP-3 and 25mm f1.4 but, of course, that would be too easy. The photos with the ZR1 were better than expected. During Cobra Starship, I shot at ISO 400 and had less keepers because of motion blur. During Flo Rida, I upped to ISO 800 and occasionally 1600. ISO 800 was decent, better than I expected and the keeper rate went way up. I can view them on a 27″ screen and not cringe at the quality. ISO 1600 is nasty. I won’t use it but perhaps a non-picky non-photographer, may find them acceptable.
I got surprisingly nice photos from the iPhone 4s but many have motion blur because the phone automatically picks the exposure. If any of my readers know of an iPhone App that can control aperture and ISO, please let me know since the default App can’t do this. The iPhone’s main advantage over the Panasonic is the f2.4 lens compared to the ZR1′s disappointing f3.3. But the point and shoot’s strengths includes a bigger sensor, an optical zoom and optical image stabilization. Its biggest advantage however is the manual controls over exposure compensation, aperture and ISO.
I shot primarily video on the iPhone since motion blur is less of a factor. And I’m amazed by what this phone can do. While it may not be the equipment of choice for serious videographers, it does a fine job in capturing the experience. I mentioned that I had an amazing up close experience at the concert. Here is the clip that gives you a feel. It may not be the highest technical quality but it leaves me with a wonderful memory of the event. It looks a bit like a frat party and it took me back to my youth.
At the concert we ran into Jake, another photographer friend and his wife Ashli. Jake kiddingly blames me for his conversion over to his Olympus OM-D. Thank you to him and his wife for driving us back to our cars so that we didn’t have to endure the train ride back north. Also thank you to both Alex Suarezes for enabling my access to a concert that I won’t soon forget.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
Moving beyond portraits at the Texas Photo Festival
On a sunny Sunday afternoon, last month, I headed east to Smithville to attend the Texas Photo Festival. It was the third time out of the last 4 years that I’ve gone. The format of the event is pretty much the same though I’ve noticed that it has become more popular over the years. This year, there was a hefty crowed of photographers shooting in a confined space in and around Main Street. The event was interesting and weird at the same time. There were sets setup with models and props along the street and the adjoining park where people could shoot, primarily portraits. The thing is, the event was now so popular that many of the sets were overflowing with weekend photographers encircling the subjects. It was difficult to get a clean portrait without getting loads of distracting photographers in the background. It has become an amusement park for photographers.
A novice photographer can have a great time going out to the Texas Photo Festival. The thing is, I guess after the 3rd time, I was ready to move on and do other things. Taking portraits in the mid day light, surrounded by lots of people, was no longer appealing. And perhaps, over the years, I have grown as a photographer or at least my interest has changed. My friend Mike pretty much agreed and we decided to walk around Smithville instead, to capture bits and pieces of this old place. We shot architecture, trinkets at antique stores and the mellow decay that we found interesting.
We reserved the best light, at the end of the day, for most of our architecture. To pass the time we explored stores and found details that would not be affected by the harsh mid-day light. Smithville is a city in transition and the Chamber of Commerce is working hard to promote the place. A couple of big Hollywood movies (Hope Floats and The Tree of Life) were filmed there and these type of events (like the photo festival) draw people from Austin and Houston. Only a few blocks away from the Main Street sets, the place was calm. As a big city person, I found the hunt for visual treasure in this small place, relaxing. For part 1 of this series, I wanted to showcase the color and texture of Smithville, as seen on that warm October afternoon.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
See more photographs that I shot with the Olympus E-P3 and Panasonic Leica 25mm and use the << Previous Photo link to see the next page of photos.
Not your father’s school carnival food
Every fall, sometime near Halloween, my son’s elementary school has their fund-raising carnival. The school and the PTA put on a fun show and they raise a lot of money. This year, I was surprised by the change in menu. Sure they had the usual pizza and burgers but how does chicken teriyaki sound? Most kids still seem to like the traditional faire but the parents gravitated towards this new entrée — the colorful bowls sold quickly. The teriyaki bowls were courtesy of a restaurant called Roll On Sushi Diner. Each serving had a different look but it had the same ingredients, arranged differently. I just loved the color and the evening light was perfect so I just had to snap a few photographs. The Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 that I’ve been talking about recently did a great job.
It occurred to me that this is one of the great things about America. As the new wave of immigrants become settled and go main stream, so does their food. Until recently, sushi and teriyaki were exotic and unheard of. Now Japanese food is mainstream enough that, at least in Austin, they make it to the school carnival menu. I remember reading in Lee Iacocca’s autobiography that he was teased at school for bring a new fangled ethic food call pizza for lunch. Times sure do change.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure details.
A boring but worthwhile Halloween in the burbs
I went trick-or-treating with my younger son last night along with other parents and kids from the neighborhood. It was a perfectly enchanting 70 degrees with clear skies.
My Olympus E-P3 with the Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 was my photo tool of choice. I got some great candids of the kids and of course the girls were always more stylish and more savvy about posing — It’s probably in their genes. Beyond the kids photos, my goal was to make a decent architectural, blue hour photo that looked Halloween-ish.
Taking such a photo in the suburbs is certainly a challenge. These places lack the density, details and interest that make downtowns more interesting. There was a nice looking halloween display but I was much too far to get there in time for blue hour. The image above was the best I can do given my limitations. This house had the most minimal of displays, just 2 orange light bulbs. No pumpkins, ghosts, goblins or vampires. No twinkling lights or inflatable monsters. Just a subtle change in light color to mark the occasion. But the orange light looks great against the blue sky. Simple is good in photography, so it works for me.
I briefly considered going downtown. Get some shots of those crazy costumed people on 6th street. I’ve thought about going for the last several years. Alas I was too tired and lazy. It was past 10pm when my family duties ended and heck it was a school night. Perhaps I’ll make it next year. But for 2012, I was stuck in the burbs with a photograph of a minimalist tract home. At least I spent some quality time with my son.
Please make sure to click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4, a first look
Careful followers of my other blog, mostlyfotos, may have noticed that I recently added a new lens to my micro 4/3 arsenal. I put EXIF data on most of my photos and if you hover over the photographs with a mouse, on this blog as well as mostlyfotos, you can see what camera and lens I used. Like I usually do with a new piece of gear, I fully embrace it. I’ve shot a lot with this new lens and here are the first set of photographs with my new baby.
Of course Lucky, our family dog, always knows when I get a new lens or camera and tries to help out. Here, he is modeling for my new Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4 lens, shot wide open. The first photos I take always seems to be of him. He is more agreeable and complains less than my kids. Inevitably, I needed to take the lens out for a spin in the real world and I decided to walk downtown on a quiet Sunday night.
I’ve eyed this 25mm f1.4 for a while. It consistently gets great reviews but it’s pricy (a list price of $600, though the price is starting to drop) and I already have the Panasonic 20mm f1.7, which is sort of similar. I finally decided to bite the bullet when I found a great deal. So far, no regrets. There is a difference between the two lenses and I’ll go over the pros and cons and compare it to the 20mm f1.7 in a future post.
But for now, take a look at the photographs I shot downtown. The amazing thing is that these were shot at ISO 200 and ISO 400, at night. The f1.4 aperture really helps and it’s fantastically sharp wide open. No comparison to my Canon 50mm at f1.4 which is more dreamy than sharp. This new Panasonic Leica is going to be a great tool for my urban night photography, I can’t wait.
So I don’t know what the exact relationship is between Panasonic and Leica. Clearly a $600 plastic shelled lens is not the same build quality as a $2000+ Leica M lens. The lens is made in Japan by Panasonic and maybe Leica shares their secret sauce. Regardless, this is a fantastic lens and I’m really enjoying it.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
See more photographs taken with the Panasonic Leica 25mm f1.4. Click << Previous Photo to see more.
Bright Lights on a Rainy Night
It’s been a busy week and I’m just getting caught up with my postings. Last weekend, I went on two photography events. On Saturday, there was the Scott Kelby World Wide Photowalk. On Sunday, I went out to Smithville for the fourth annual Texas Photo Festival. Then during the week, I hopped out to California for several days on a business trip. Between these three activities, I have loads of new photographs to post and to talk about for future blog entries. It’s always a fun challenge to feed the blog beast with new content.
Tonight, I want to showcase a photograph I took during the World Wide Photowalk. In many ways, this image captures the mood of that rainy night. In Austin, there were several different Scott Kelby photowalks. I, of course, chose the one at night, lead by my friend Alex. I’m sure my regular blog readers know that I like the evening light especially for urban landscapes. This photo combines several elements that I like. Elements that I don’t always succeed in capturing, so I’m happy when it all falls into place.
So why do I like this image? First, there is the glow of light that always attracts me. And it’s harder than you think to find strong sources of light. Austin, like many U.S. cities, is not brightly lit. This is in stark contrast to the mega Asian cities like Tokyo where the ambient light at night can be surprisingly bright. In this photo, the light is courtesy of the Paramount theater on Congress Avenue. Next, there are all those great reflections that amplify the glow. We get a nice reflection off the car window but there is also a satisfying shine off the rain-soaked streets. Finally, that bright and contrasting color adds a bit of punch. Both the yellow and the purple are again supplied by the Paramount.
I think the dark shadows, the urban look, and the rain all captures the feel of that night. There were several bouts of rain that threatened to cut short our photowalk. For the most part, we were lucky and the bad weather held off. A final light shower added that bit of sparkle. All that’s needed is some Jazz and a cocktail to complete the scene.
Have a great Sunday evening.
Please make sure to click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Austin Fashion Week, The Driskill Fashion Show
In this final posting about 2012 Austin Fashion Week, I’m going to share scenes from the catwalk at the Driskill Hotel. I got a special opportunity this year to shoot at one of the “serious” fashion show venues thanks to Kellye King from AZIZ Salon. While it’s not New York, Milan or Paris, the event still had a feeling of a big production. Certainly on a different scale from the shows that I’ve gone to at local Salons.
Unlike the photos from Austin Fashion Week, behind the scenes, where I shot with my 35mm f2.0 prime lens in a documentary style, the fashion show photos were taken with my 70-200mm f4 zoom lens. In a nod to the Wizard of Oz, the black and white of the behind the scenes gives way to glorious color as the transformed models take the stage.
My friend Steve Wampler, who has a lot more experience at these things gave me some pointers. He mentioned that the lighting was adequate at f4 so I decided to use my 70-200 zoom lens for maximum flexibility. I also brought my 85mm f1.8 prime lens but found that it did not work as well. Even with the bigger aperture, I preferred a deeper depth of field and the image stabilization of my zoom. Something I didn’t realize is that there is a standard look to shooting these catwalk fashion shows. Steve mentioned that you usually don’t want to cut off any part of the model and you ideally want the model’s back leg to be lifted. And he is right. When I look through the fashion shots from the New York Times, for example, most of their images follow this standard look. I found that it took a bit of timing and I need more practice to get that perfect shot. I do admit though, that after an hour, just trying to capture this look got a little boring.
It makes sense to show the model from head to toe. After all, it is a fashion show, and the clothing and the shoes are the main attraction. For me though, I’m more interested in the models and I frequently found myself wanting to zoom in. Getting a half body or more of a head shot to focus more on the face and their expression. I ended up doing a mixture of both to keep it interesting. I was perched on a 8 x 10 foot platform with about a dozen media photographers and videographers at the end of the runway. And while this type of photography was not very creative, the whole experience was kind of fun. I felt like I was part of the media and I had a level of access that I usually do not get.
The hardest thing about shooting this kind of event, the weight of the camera. The entire show, including intermissions, ran about 3 hours. For a person used to using light micro 4/3 cameras these days, the Canon 7D with the 70-200mm f4 lens started getting pretty heavy as the night went on. I noticed that my shots towards the end where not framed as straight. Steve did suggest that I use a monopod which would have really helped. I didn’t bring one since I didn’t have a head that allowed my to position the camera in the portrait orientation. If I were going to do this kind of shooting with any regularity, I would definitely invest in a good monopod with an adjustable head. My shots would have been better and I would be less tired.
Between the behind the scenes and the fashion show, I had a fun night of photography. I shot both halves in a very different way which allowed me to experience more variety. If I had to choose, I liked the documentary style of shooting better. I found it to be more creative and less predictable. I is also similar to street photography which I enjoy doing. That said, being up on “stage” with the other photographers is something that I usually don’t get to do. New experiences can also be fun and keeps the whole photography thing fun and fresh.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure details.
Blue Clouds over Loop 360
I’ve carried around my Panasonic Lumix ZR1 almost everywhere. It’s small enough that it easily fit into my pant’s pocket. And though this is an inexpensive, refurnished point and shoot I got for $70, it really does take decent photographs especially at ISO 80. So much so that, for now at least, it ‘s my daily carry around camera. For a while I was hoping my water proof Sony TX5 would fill that role but I found that ultimately, even at its lowest ISO, the image quality didn’t satisfy. I stopped carrying it around, even though it was rugged and smaller than the Panasonic.
I took this photograph a couple of days ago. We were going out to dinner and I noticed these stormy clouds after a day of badly needed rain. It was still bright enough that I could shoot easily at ISO 80. A little motion blur, leading lines and a melancholy blue image creating a moody photo for the start of a new work week. Taken in West Austin traveling along Loop 360, also know as the Capital of Texas Highway. What a cool name for a highway.
Please make sure to click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
The Panasonic ZR1 matches the Olympus E-P3
A couple of weeks ago, I went out to the Roaring Fork restaurant in North Austin with a friend. We talked about life, photography and art. The meal was a prelude to a downtown photowalk. The thing was, both of us were ambivalent about making the trek down south. The meal and drinks were nice and we felt comfortable just talking about the challenges of life and photography. I did want to test my Panasonic ZR1, however, by creating urban landscapes. So instead of going downtown, we settled for making images in and around the modern, upscale restaurant.
As you know, urban landscapes and architecture is one of my favorite subjects and I’m in the middle of my point and shoot challenge. I want to make photographs with this cheap $70 point and shoot that equals the quality of the images that I get with my other, more expensive cameras. And at ISO 80 the little Panasonic does a really nice job. Surprisingly so. The thing is, with a maximum aperture of f3.3 and at ISO 80, I need to use a tripod for any image that is not in good light. This was certainly the case for the 3 photos I took with the ZR1.
The mercury vapor lamps created this odd green color and it looks fantastic against the blue sky. The out of camera JPEGs were enhanced with even more color saturation, to give that extra pop. Since the camera lacks any kind of P S A M control, I have to use the appropriate scene mode to create these long exposures. The camera doesn’t have any exposure compensation on any image that is over about a 1/4 second. I use the Night Scenery mode or the Starry Sky mode instead to approximate the best exposure.
How good are these JPEG images? At ISO 80, I have no complaints. The photograph at the bottom was taken with the Olympus E-P3 and 14mm lens. The framing is not exactly the same and the Panasonic at a 25mm equivalent is a wider than my 28mm Olympus view. The colors were a lot different too but I tweaked the Olympus RAW to approximate the Panasonic color. The Olympus RAW is sharper but the image is actually noisier than the ZR1 point and shoot. I ran Topaz Denoise on the Olympus RAW and the resulting image was amazingly similar to the Panasonic output.
It would be hard to pick the two apart other than, even at F9, the Olympus still has a slightly shallower DOF. The deep DOF on the point and shoot was beneficial here and allowed me to take a brighter image, 5 seconds faster, since its aperture was at f3.3. Since the point and shot has such a smaller sensor, even if the aperture is wide open at f3.3, the DOF is still deeper than f9 on the Olympus.
Surprising and interesting results. Image quality and noise levels can vary a bit depending on the scene so this in not a comprehensive test, however, very promising results nevertheless. If I’m willing to use a tripod. the is no telling what this little camera can do.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure detail.
From fashion to football, embrace the limitations
Here is a change of pace from the previous fashion show post. Several weeks ago I went to the first high school football game of the season, McCallum vs. Anderson High School. High School football is practically a religion here in Texas and I was going to shoot it with my newest camera, the Panasonic ZR1. For those of you that are following my blog you know that I’m in the midst of a challenge. To make compelling images from this inexpensive point and shoot that I got factory refurbished for $70. All cameras have limitations and this one certainly has its share. So how do I overcome its shortcomings and still make an interesting image?
Unlike a DLSR or my mirrorless system cameras, these point and shoots, with their tiny sensors get noisy at modest ISOs. The usable, high-quality limit in color for this camera, maybe ISO 400. I sometimes push the black and white images up to ISO 800. I was zoomed into the action and the maximum aperture was f5.9. The light was starting to fade and keeping the ISO at 400 at this aperture meant a shutter speed of about 1/50. Not enough to get a tack sharp image. I decided to make the best of it and go for the motion blur. It took several shots and this one looked the best. Just the right amount of blur, enough to look purposely done but you still see enough detail.
I gave suggestions of how to take great photos with point and shoots but here is another tip. Embrace the limitations. You are not going to get Sports Illustrated caliber images with a point and shoot, especially in marginal light. For that you need long lenses with large apertures and a fast focusing DLSR. Instead think of how to make interesting images within the available parameters. That is what I tried to do here. I zoomed in, the equivalent of 200mm, to simplify the composition. The motion blur gives a sense of the action and something potentially more interesting than a tack sharp image.
I shot the image below during the same football game. Since there was no action, I could further slow down my shutter and increase quality by using a lower ISO. I used a different technique since the circumstances and limitations were different from the action shot.
Please make sure to click on the photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure detail.
Austin Fashion Week, behind the scenes
I’ve posted a bunch of entries this year from Austin Fashion week. All the events that I blogged about were free, open to the public and held at local salons. It was good fun and a great way to practice my portrait taking skills. For the first time, with the help of the fine folks at AZIZ Salon, I gained access to a major Fashion Week Event. It was held at the fancy and historic Driskill Hotel in downtown Austin. Unlike the Salon events, this one costs $60 to attend. In exchange for access, I shot the event for AZIZ.
I was granted special access to the back room where I shot behind the scenes photographs. This was where the models were being “prepped” for the big show and where AZIZ Salon did the hair styling. I was probably there for about 30 minutes and had a blast shooting the models during their transformation. It almost felt like street photography and I shot it in that style and even turned the images into a classic black and white.
I also got access to shoot the runway show. There was a small 10 foot by 8 foot raised platform, at the end of the runway, where all the media people were positioned. I was one of about a dozen people packed on that stage. There were still shooters from news organizations and video cameras from the local TV news crews. Everyone was very respectful even friendly as we shared this small area. I’ll talk more about the runway portion in another post. Today I wanted to showcase the behind the scenes photographs. A big thanks to Kellye King for getting me into this event. She directs Public Relations for AZIZ and is responsible for much of the marketing and event production.
Like my other Fashion Week events, I used my Canon 7D. I had 3 lenses, my 70-200mm f4 IS, the 35mm f2.0 and the 85mm f1.8. I brought the 35mm specifically to use behind the scenes. I briefly considered bringing my 50mm instead but decided that the 35 will work better in tighter spaces. I think I made the right call. I also considered using a bounce flash but the ceilings in the ball room where really high and painted yellow. A bounce flash didn’t work well and the yellow color cast created by the light bouncing off the ceiling was a bit nasty. I decided to use the 35mm with a big aperture and a higher ISO and no flash.
Shooting the back room was fun. I found it quick and easy. Sort of like a combination of street photography with a bit of event photography thrown in. I purposely wanted that unposed photo-journalist look, catching the models and the stylists in action. Ideally, I would blend into the background so that my subjects would not realize that they were being photographed. For the most part I succeeded or they just ignored me, which worked out great. While I used the 7D, I think my Olympus E-P3 with the 20mm f1.7 would have worked just as well. I didn’t want to bring a lot of equipment so I decided to stick with just the Canon for that night.
I culled my favorites down to about 50 images. The actions shots of the hair and makeup were important but I really liked catching the models in their relaxed state. Some sat there zoned out, others were lost in their music. I posted a small sample here but you can see more behind the scenes photographs at AZIZ Salon’s Facebook Page.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure details.
Update 9/10/2012: Here is a montage of photos taken at the event. It’s not a complete collection but it gives a nice flavor of the type of images I created.
How to protect your photos against a catastrophe
Is your photo library protected against catastrophe? I thought I had a pretty good backup strategy until that terrible day a year ago. Labor Day weekend 2011, after the hottest summer on record in Texas, a fire broke out in Bastrop county, just east of Austin. The fire raged for a month and destroyed nearly 1,700 homes. The worst wildfire in Texas history. I remember that day. Driving down a highway in Austin, to the West I saw a large plume of smoke and to the East an even larger bank of smoke from Bastrop. The record heat and drought ignited wild fires throughout Texas. On that windy day, there were multiple wildfires raging in the Austin area.
Tragically, my friend lost her home and almost everything in that Bastrop fire. The story could have been worse. Luckily there was no loss of life. Her family, her horses and pets got out safely. She also had portable backups of her photographs which she was able to save. I took these photographs of my friend’s place when I went out there to help her clean up. The photos are used with her permission so that I can make a point. You may not be able to save everything when a catastrophe happens but your digital files can be safe.
I’ve always been very good about my photo backups. I use Apple’s Aperture 3 software and I have two backup vaults on two external drives. I also have a backup on a portable USB drive which I store offsite. But I realized that there were holes in my backup strategy, and the tragic Bastrop fire brought them to light. Here are 5 tips to protect your digital photo library.
1. Make at least 1 copy of your photo library on an external drive, the more copies the better. If possible, use an automated process to continuously backup your photo library.
2. I you don’t have an automated process, have a good manual process that ensures backup. This is what I do. I make sure that I have 3 copies of a photograph before I erase my CF and SD cards. I have two external drives connected to my Macintosh and I use Aperture 3′s vault system to back up my Photo library to both drives.
3. RAID systems and Drobos may work fine but I don’t use them. I prefer multiple separate external drives. Each drive is a separate, independent entity. If one drive happens to go bad, I have a 2nd completely separate backup drive. The potential issue with multiple drive RAID system is if there is a glitch in the drive interface, all of your data on the multiple drives may be at risk. Also if you use a proprietary backup solution, what happens if that company goes out of business? If I need to get my data out of the building, carrying a single external drive is a lot easier than carrying a big RAID box full of multiple drives.
4. Have offsite backup. I also use a small, portable USB drive for backup and keep it offsite. Offsite means anywhere out of your house or office. Bring the drive to a friend’s house in another part of town. Keep it in a safety deposit box. Put it any place safe, separate from where your main photo library is located. The downside with this solution? If you shoot a lot of photographs like I do, your offsite back is never complete. Suppose you copy and move your library offsite religiously once a week. You can still end up loosing a week’s worth of images. And let’s be honest. Most people will find it difficult to use this offsite method on a consistent basis. Inevitably your once a week schedule may start slipping. At least mine did.
5. Have an automated offsite backup. This is the change I made to my backup strategy after the Bastrop fire. I now have an automated cloud based backup solution. There are many services out there. Backblaze, Carbonite, CrashPlan, Mozy and a bunch more. If you have a large library, it will take you a while to upload all your files and you do need a fast internet connection. After a bit of research I decided to use CrashPlan. I’ve been using them for year now with good results. Within the last year, I have updated a failed drive and moved to a new computer. I was able to successfully reconnect my new computer and new drive to my cloud based Crashplan backup. I’m now up to 900GB of storage in the cloud.
So there you have it. My backup strategy for my precious photographs. Is it completely bullet proof? Probably not. But I do have multiple redundant backups updated in a consistent and automatic process. And my friend in Bastrop? She has rebuilt her home and getting settled in her new life. While she might have lost most of her physical possessions, at least she has her photographs which she can cherish.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure details.
A fashion show at the AZIZ Salon grand opening
The AZIZ Salon’s grand opening was my biggest challenge of all the 2012 Austin Fashion Week events. I did my first blog coverage last week, where I captured a very excited and joyful model. It’s always great to see someone having so much fun and many of the visitors to my blog from Facebook seem to agree. I also mentioned in that piece that I found the event challenging to shoot and that I made some mistakes along the way. I’m happy to say the images turned out a lot better than expected and I’ll talk about some of these challenges I had at the end. I want to start with the event itself and how AZIZ organized a first rate grand opening and a terrific night of entertainment.
I arrived at the new AZIZ Salon in the upscale Arboretum shopping center in North West Austin. I was there about 30 minutes after the doors opened and it was already packed with a long line out the door. It probably took 15 minutes or so to get in. Of all the Fashion Week events I’ve gone to this year and in the 3 previous years, this was the most crowded. The salon did a masterful campaign to get the word out about their grand opening.
Once inside, the airy split level multistory interior was a buzz with activity. They had a generous supply of drinks, free makeovers, food and music. The event had a good vibe and everything was professionally done. I met my photographer friend, Steve there and I joined a few other photographers and talked in the corner. The fashion show was still more than an hour away, so we settled in to have a good time. I shot some guests and met the owners and had a drink. I attended the AZIZ event last year and I was pleasantly surprised that they remembered some of my images from that event.
The makeshift runway started from the front door, down a short flight of stairs, all the way to the end. The crowds formed a natural enclosure. What sets these salon fashion shows apart from the serious raised catwalk events is seeing the crowd interaction. If you look at my images, the ones with the model by the front door are not nearly as personal and interesting as the one with the audience around them. The audience’s reaction to the model is what I find interesting just as much as the models themselves.
I noticed that the most popular camera seems to be the iPhone and there were a lot fewer point and shoot cameras. No big surprise there. It also seems like all the big cameras, the DSLRs are used by the men, including yours truly. It’s wonderful that so many people have cameras these days. Go back 10 or 20 years ago and I’m sure the scene will be entirely different. Perhaps they might have had one professional photographer covering the event and maybe a few people with point and shoot film cameras. The world of low-cost digital has a democratizing effect on seemingly everything these days. More people are partaking and creating their own content. No doubt a bunch of their images were shared on Facebook.
On the flip side, I wonder what kind of quality they are getting. While the salon looks well-lit to the human eye, it’s not really so for the camera. Even using a “serious” camera like my Canon 7D, it’s not a slam dunk to get, well exposed and sharp photographs. I’m sure my expectations of image quality is higher than the average iPhone shooter but here is why this environment is a bit harder to shoot that you will first expect.
The first thing you have to realize is that you are taking action shots in an interior setting, always a challenge. Getting a blur free, sharp image of someone who is posing for you is one thing, try doing that for someone who is walking at a steady pace down a runway. I kept my shutter speed at 1/200 of a second to minimize motion blur. I didn’t want to aim the flash directly at the models so I used a bounce flash instead. Direct flash shots usually don’t work very well indoors. Bouncing the light off the ceiling gives a softer illumination to the entire area rather than just the model. Even if you have an expensive camera, those direct flash shots give you that typical and less desirable “yes I used my flash” type look, which I try to avoid.
While I wanted to include the background and I really didn’t have a choice given the setup, I wanted to deemphasize it somewhat. Having the audience in the background is great but when they too are in sharp focus, it detracts from the subject. The background and foreground compete and you end up getting a very cluttered image. To make the background out of focus, you need to use a lens with a big aperture, setting your F number to the lowest available. In typical kit lenses your F number may go down to f3.5. On pro zoom lenses, down to f2.8. I used my 50mm prime lens which allowed me to take the Aperture down to f1.4. Here is where it gets tricky. How do you balance the aperture size, the light coming from the flash bounced off the ceiling, stopping the action with a high shutter speed and get everything in focus? This is why shooting in the place like this is a bit more challenging than it looks. At least it is for me since it’s something that I don’t do very often.
It took me a few minutes to get the settings dialed in correctly. And even then, I wasn’t entirely sure the images were coming out. I had to change several variables very quickly to adjust to the environment and situation. That is why shooting in these places can be fun, challenging and frustrating all at the same time. After fiddling with the shutter speed, aperture size, flash exposure compensation I hit upon a recipe that seemed to work. I wasn’t entirely sure at the time but it turned out better than I thought. While I usually shoot in Aperture Priority mode (the A or Av setting on the dial) I always use Manual exposure in these cases. My final settings, after all the experimentation, ISO 800, a shutter speed of 1/200 second, an Aperture of f1.8 to f2.2 and my bounce flash exposure set to a negative 1 stop. Of course there are always compromises. Having a non-zooming 50mm made it tougher and more restrictive in my framing. The shallow depth of field created by the f1.8 aperture made it more critical to focus and shoot quickly. At this depth of field, less than a step of movement taken by the model will throw her out of focus.
So what was the big mistake I made? It was at the beginning before I ever shot the camera. I chose to position myself in the middle near the steps, at the halfway point of the runway. Consequently, I was always forced to shoot models in motion. When they passed by me, there were too close and moving too fast for a good shot. I ended up taking pictures at either the doorway, where they started or near the end of the runway when they turned and headed back up. Catching the models when they are stopped is a whole lot easier to do. What I should have done was to position myself at the end of the runway where I can catch the models facing me and paused before they head back up. If I did this, much of the technical struggle to have a fast shutter speed and extra fast and accurate focus would have been reduced. All was not lost however. Because of my position, I undoubtedly got compositions that were different from the others. I also got the fun challenge of figuring out my exposure on the fly; forcing me to adjust and learn. The challenge made all the more fun since I ended up with images that I liked.
Please make sure to click on the photographs to see a larger image and hover over the photos to see the exposure details.















































































































