An alternative view of the Chinese New Year
I decided to try something new. An experiment in photographic processing. I had some extra images from the recent Chinese New Year celebration that I blogged about last week. These photos were taken at the closest point to the action. I used my smallish Olympus E-PL1 and stuck it out there almost in between the legs of the dancers to see what I can capture. What resulted was a smokey mess but the images had some potential. Unlike the very colorful photographs from my first Chinese New Year post, I decided to go in an entirely different direction. To recover the most details out of the haze, I decided to lose the color. In found with black and white, I can push the detail recovery a bit more than in color. So as an exercise, I decided to experiment with my Topaz B&W Effects plug-in. The software is designed to create black and white conversions that mimic the old style black and white films. While the software has a large number of presets, I decided to do a custom effect. As I played with the software, I ended up creating images that, in my mind, reminded me of vintage travel photographs from the Far East.
What resulted is something I find interesting. Something certainly different from my norm. If you don’t look closely and you ignore the camera bags and the bits of modernity, I find myself transported back a 100 years to some village in China. To me, these images seem timeless and exotic. So I deem my experiment a success, if only to show an alternate reality of a scene from Austin, Texas in 2012. The photograph at the top of the post is my favorite. I posted the original RAW at the bottom for comparison.
The photographs were taken with my Olympus E-PL1. Please make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Here is a sample of my work. I’ve posted them on my one-photo-per-day photo blog, mostlyfotos. There are a lot of images so click the << Previous Photo link to see more. You can also hover over the photos to see the exposure information.
Sometimes white balance can make all the difference
Several days ago, I posted Image post-processing, a necessity or cheating? that elicited a very healthy and civil discussion on my blog. The best ever and it is fantastic. I love how people may not agree but can still express their opinions in a constructive way. One of my readers called out this particular photo that I posted in mostlyfotos and was wondering about how I post-processed it. So I took a look back on my Aperture 3 library to see what I did with the image.
Before I get into the particulars, a little background on the image. This Airstream trailer is located on South Congress Avenue (SoCo) which is a hip and trendy area south of downtown Austin. It’s in the same neighborhood as the Heritage Boot image that I used as an example in my above mentioned blog post, thought the trailer image above was taken one week earlier. Ever since I got into urban landscape photography, I’ve been captivated by the blue hour and its contrast to made-made lights. I like the warm yellow glow of the lights contrasting with the blue sky. The challenge is that, at least here in Texas, the “Blue Hour” last about 15 minutes. I talk more about blue hour and my experiences around it in two other blog posts which you can find here and here, if you are interested. I also love these bare lights that are strung around the trailer. I don’t know why but these kind of lights always seem to make me happy. Maybe a reminder of a distant pleasant experience that has imprinted on me but that I have long since forgotten.
The most noticeable post-processing change I made was with the white balance. The RAW image had a color temperature of 4810K (Kelvin), I shifted the white balance to 3736K. I also added a bit of red to the tint so that image would be a touch less green. I wasn’t concerned with the exact white balance values, rather I shifted the slider to what I like aesthetically. Keep in mind that I was not going for color accuracy here. If I did, I would have done a custom white balance or shot with a gray card. I wanted to create an image with a certain feel. I wanted my blue hour sky to be a rich blue but contrast with the warm yellow glow. Next, I added saturation to intensify the colors a bit and brightened the mid-tones somewhat by using levels. Finally, I added some sharpening and definition (micro contrast). While the Olympus E-PL1 generally has satisfactory noise levels up to ISO 800, depending on the exposure, I can get more noise than I want. In this image, the blue areas were more noisy and my manipulations increased the noise level somewhat, but not overly so. I used the Topaz DeNoise plug-in to clean up the digital noise. I used Apple’s Aperture 3 program to post-process everything else, in fact, I solely use Aperture for 95% of my non-HDR images. I fired up a copy of Photoshop Elements 8 so that I can use the Topaz plug-in. This may sound like a lot of post-processing but with Aperture, I can do this quickly. I post-process all my images and most take about 10 – 15 seconds to do. I’m guessing that this one may have taken a few minutes, with the bulk of the time used to launch Photoshop and run the denoise plug-in.
I hope you found this interesting. A bit more detail of the mechanics of what I changed compared to my first post-processing blog entry. The original un-processed image is below for your viewing pleasure. There are things that bug me about the composition. For example, it won’t be the ideal product photograph since the Hey Cupcake! name is blocked by the pole. But I really like the colors and I think it captures the warm glow that I was after. And even though there is nobody in line, rather than looking cold and lonely, I find that there is a warmth and cheerfulness to the image. At least that’s the way I see it. What do you think?
Make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image. Hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Here is a sample of my work. I’ve posted them on my one-photo-per-day photo blog, mostlyfotos. There are a lot of images so click the << Previous Photo link to see more. You can also hover over the photos to see the exposure information.
Image post-processing, a necessity or cheating?
I just finished reading Kirk Tuck’s blog post Hard work is hard. Everything changes. in which he compares the traditional photojournalist’s, get everything in camera, no post-processing allowed philosophy verses the more recent modifications are good, the more post-processing the better movement. That got me thinking about my views on post-processing images. I don’t have the years of experience that Kirk has in photography. If anything, I’m a newcomer, just getting seriously into photography less than 6 years ago. While I’m certainly old enough to have shot film, I never did any serious photography back in the film days. Back then I shot my point and shoot film camera and mainly took snaps during vacations. It wasn’t until digital that I really got interested in photography.
I must admit, I have a split perspective on this debate over post-processing. While chronologically, I’m now considered in middle age, at least according to Wikipedia, photographically, I’m more like a teenager. I’m old enough to appreciate the old photographic masters and the beautiful black and whites that I remember from my youth, while never actively participating in its creation. I find it very amusing that people younger than me, that grew up with film, wax poetically about how wonderful the film day’s were. I am a digital photographer. I have no true historic context and have no desire to return to the days of film. I am puzzled when people still seem to be stuck in the notion that images should not be post-processed. I see people brag that there was no post-processing done on the image and I think “Why?” you have a wonderful image, it could be so much better with post-processing. Why this hangup with no modifications after the shutter is clicked?
Ok, I’m not completely ignorant. I know there are still valid reasons to do things in camera without any (or much) modification. Photojournalists have a set of ethics that allow only minimal changes, if any, to their images. Their world is tricky because allowing changes is a slippery slope. What can they ethically change that doesn’t compromise their sense of journalistic integrity. While adding additional missiles and smoke trails to war footage certainly crosses the line, isn’t there some post-processing that improves the image and does not distort their message? I understand that high volume commercial photographers and event photographers need to get it right in camera so that they can minimize post-processing time. They run a business and any time spent cleaning an photograph or fixing things in post, takes money away from the bottom line. But how about the others. Artistic photographers, hobbyists and amateurs that have the time to craft each image. Why do some of these people get stuck on the notion that post-processing is no good or somehow is cheating? To me, creating the image starts with the camera and is only finished in post-processing. I feel the image coming out of the camera is still half-baked. Its potential is there but not fully realized.
That said, I see some of my fellow contemporary photographers take post-processing to a whole different level, and not all of it is very good. I understand why Kirk thinks HDR photographs are “Technicolor Vomit”. Yes, there are some truly horrific HDR images out there. And if it isn’t gaudy HDRs, then it’s their close cousins, which feature heavy textures on images, adds grunge and relies on retro cross-processing effects. Adding all this post-processing to a bad image does not improve the image, of course. So why go to extremes. There is a certain level of post-processing that can dramatically improve a good image but one does not have to resort to extreme HDR or other post-processing shenanigans to make an interesting image.
I remember when I first got into digital photography and I saw some spectacular imagery with rich colors that were tastefully done. I was perplexed because none of my images came close to what I saw. My images seem dull and flat in comparison and it wasn’t the lighting. There was something tangibly different. What I discovered and what is usually not talked about as openly (at least back then) was the amount of post-processing that goes into the best images out there. I’m not talking about radical changes or body and face sculpting done in fashion magazines. I’m talking about tasteful but dynamic changes that greatly enhance an image. What some people out there may not realize is that a digital image, particularly when taken in RAW, is purposely dull. It is up to the photographer to alter or post-process the image to bring out its full glory. That would include some sharpening to counteract the built-in blurring filter (the anti-aliasing filter) that purposely designed to make a digital image less sharp. The saturation of the image needs to be increased to bring out the true colors that were locked in the digital negative. So, when people take pride in the fact that their image is SOOC (Straight Out Of the Camera) they are actually short-changing their selves and their image. Color from film is different from digital color, but have you ever seen how vivid an image shot in Fujifilm’s Velvia really is? I was really surprised how dull much of the digital images are in comparison to film. Much of this, I contend, is due to the lack of good post-processing. I not proposing that we need to emulate the exact look of film, but I am saying that we should unleash the potential of digital.
I have improved my post-processing over the years, at least I think so. I know there is a lot more to learn and I’m sure the look of my images will change and evolve over time. But I realize that there is a middle ground between the old-fashioned no post-processing stance and the throw every crazy effect in the book point of view. I enjoy vibrant color but I also don’t want some trendy over-processed, over-hyped image. I realize the line between tasteful and gaudy is not always clear and its interpretation varies with the individual. I know at times, my image may step over that fuzzy line, though sometimes it is on purpose. I am gratified that even Kirk acknowledged that my HDRs weren’t too crazy. The photograph at the top is something that I recently posted on mostlyfotos. It is an example of my most recent post-processing style. Colorful but not crazy. I took a single RAW photograph with my Olympus E-PL1 with no HDR processing. For comparison, the image below is what the untouched original looks like. Life is too short to have dull, unprocessed images.
Make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image. Hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Here is a sample of my work. I’ve posted them on my one-photo-per-day photo blog, mostlyfotos. There are a lot of images so click the << Previous Photo link to see more. You can also hover over the photos to see the exposure information.
A trip to the supermarket can be exotic
Do you know that Austin, Texas has a Chinatown? Well not exactly. It is a strip mall called Chinatown Center which does contain my Asian stores and restaurants. I headed up there yesterday to see the Chinese New Year celebrations and take some photographs of dancing dragons and such. Except I messed up. It turned out they were going to have the festivities next Sunday. At least I didn’t miss it. The Asian American Cultural Center in Austin was having a New Year’s event on Saturday so I just assumed that the shopping mall was having theirs the next day. Anyway, I decided that since I’m already here, maybe I can find something interesting to photograph.
I brought my big gun out to the event, my Canon 7D with my 70-200mm f4 and even my external flash, just in case it got sunny (a flash is really useful on sunny days, to even out the shadows). Luckily, I also brought my less conspicuous Olympus E-PL1 with my favorite 20mm f1.7 lens. If I’m walking into a supermarket, I was certainly not going to open fire with my Canon 7D. The Canon may be a bit less noticeable that a real gun but it was sure to attract attention just the same. WIth the small Olympus over my shoulder, I decided to go hunting for some dragons. This year is the Year of the Dragon on the Chinese zodiac, a particularly auspicious year I’m told. I wanted a nice dragon photo to put on mostlyfotos, my one photo a day, photo blog.
In the prominent middle building of the Chinatown Center, there is a large Asian supermarket. A sure sign that the Asian population in Austin is growing. There were also a healthy number of non-Asian customers, a cross cultural mix that is one of my favorite things about this country. I didn’t have to go far to find my dragon. Flanking the entrance were two large stone dragons. These imposing carvings would look good at a temple but with the shopping carts in the background, I found it changeling to get a nice composition. I decided a closeup was best to eliminate the background as much as possible. Once inside, I was greeted by a large, red, multi-language banner in English, Vietnamese and Chinese. I wished I had a wide-angle lens with me, the 40mm view didn’t allow for the best composition. I stepped back as far as I could but the image below is about the best that I can do. The rare times when a simple kit zoom would have worked a lot better.
I found more dragons inside. Trinkets found in the gift area. There were comical hanging dragons, colorful dragon statues and even intensely golden dragons. Nothing too exciting photographically but it will give me something to post on mostlyfotos. The image at the top of this page is my favorite. Something a bit different from the norm. These catfish were alive, swimming in a packed tank, ready to be purchased and become someone’s meal. Turns out the most interesting photos I took during this outing were of dragons and fish. I didn’t feel comfortable taking candid people photos inside a private business, unlike an open air public market. The camera I had didn’t attract too much attention but I didn’t want to blatantly go around snapping tons of photographs, most stores tend to frown up this kind of thing. The point I wanted to make is that potentially interesting photos can be captured in all kinds of places, even in a supermarket. Photograph the world from your neighborhood. In the United States, there are enough ethnic festivals and stores to capture a slice of American life that a bit unexpected. Whether it be a Dia de Los Muertos Parade in downtown or a Asian supermarket, there are opportunities abound to see different things.
On the way home, I stopped at a Vietnamese sandwich shop. Did you know the Vietnamese make great French baguettes? Yup, Vietnam was once a French colony and there was certainly a culinary influence. They also make a ham and pork sandwich on a baguette with fresh vegetables that the Vietnamese usually put on their noodle soups. A tasty end to a mix-up that turned into a short Asian tour. Maybe next Sunday, I’ll get to the New Year celebration, which is a bit late since, today January 23rd is the official Lunar New Year.
Happy Chinese New Year!
May the year of the Dragon bring you success in photography and in life.
Lots of dragons and fishes all shot with the Olympus E-PL1 and 20mm f1.7 lens. Please make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
The Two Olympus Pens in action
At the end of the last episode, Kirk, Frank and I were taking about life and photography over coffee at Caffe Medici. We all just happen to run into each other in downtown Austin, all toting our small mirrorless cameras. Coffee time was over and we continued on with our photo excursion. Frank mentioned that Nissan was having a Leaf demo, a look at their newest high-tech all-electric car, a couple of blocks away. With a small group and no line and we quickly got in to see the high-tech displays. I even took a short test drive. The Leaf was certainly futuristic, very quiet and zippy. As cute as the cars were, I was more attracted by a different photo opportunity. Jacklyn and Odessa were part of the demo team at the Nissan display. There were tucked safely behind a barricade so that they would be safe from crazy street photographers. That didn’t stop me of course. I need to take opportunities like these and ask total strangers if I can take their photo. Like many people, I find this to be a challenge but like many things, with practice, things get easier. Kirk is the master of talking to strangers and winning their trust. I experience this skill first hand over a year ago in San Antonio when Kirk lead that he called an anti-workshop. It was then when I made a concerted effort to get better at asking strangers if I can take their photograph. I remember writing about this early on in this blog in a post called Overcoming the Fear of Photo Rejection. After a year or so, it is getting easier but I’m still not up to Kirk’s level of expertise, but I keep on trying.
This was also perfect time to test out my new two camera combo, that I had with me. The first photograph has taken with a Olympus E-PL1 with the 20mm Lumix f1.7 lens. I find the 40mm equivalent lens to make excellent environmental portraits. Not in this case though. There are too many distractions and the surroundings are not exactly inspiring. Luckily, I had the second camera with a lens that works a lot better in these situations. A quick switch to my other, identical Olympus E-PL1 did the trick. This second camera had the new Olympus 45mm f1.8 lens. At a 90mm equivalent, and a big aperture. I was able to get a closeup and blur the displeasing background into a creamy haze. I took both images from about the same vantage point on the other side of the barrier. I felt obliged to test out my new portrait lens so I continued with some headshots. Jacklyn was a bit shy so she oped out but Odessa seemed really happy to stand in as a model.
WIth my two camera test deemed a success we continued west, back to where our cars were parked. In the previous post, I wrote in detail of how I ended up with this two camera setup. After over a year of looking, reading and testing I finally came up with this winning combination. In the next weeks and months, I’ll write some more about how this 2 Olympus combination is working out.
Make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image. Hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
Here is a sample of my work using the Olympus E-PL1. I’ve posted them on my one-photo-per-day photo blog, mostlyfotos. There are a lot of images so click the << Previous Photo link to see more. You can also hover over the photos to see the exposure information.
Coffee with Kirk and Frank, Life’s Good.
I had a delightful time at the Caffe Medici last Sunday and I’m not even a coffee drinker. Of course, for me, it’s about the people I’m with and not necessarily about the drink, though serious coffee drinkers may disagree. What makes this special is it was all unplanned. It all came about because I decided to change my usual pattern and do something different. As I mentioned in my previous post, I was dropping my parents at the airport and decided to take a photo detour through downtown.
After I captured some contrasting flora, I headed south toward the train tracks. I’m constantly amazed by the pace of change and the new development in downtown Austin. It’s a trend that I like. Now, parts of downtown actually resembles a real city with the critical mass of buildings, people and businesses to make it a living entity. The train situation is decidedly backwards and depressing. Tucked away at the end of the downtown core is a pathetic, small AMTRAK station. Quite understandable since we probably get one or so trains passing through the city per day. Maybe because I’ve grew up in the East Coast and have visited the great train cities in Europe and Japan, but it just saddens me that such a great and growing city like Austin has such a diminished rail presence. Yes, cars now rule the country and Austin is no exception. Stepping over the rails and shooting the newly rising downtown condos, I hear a familiar voice. Well, if it isn’t my friend Kirk Tuck, commercial photographer and blogger from the very popular Visual Science Lab. He was riding his very cool and sleek Bodhi Electric bike and was on his way to his own photo excursion. He was generous enough to let me tag along and we headed east towards the center of town.
We were busy making our compositions when Kirk remarks, “Is that Frank?”. “You mean, our Frank?”, I responded. Yes, it was Frank, another one of our photo friends. He too was walking along with this camera, practicing his craft. So now, 3 strong, we continue east towards a 2 block area that almost resembled New York City in activity. There were tons of pedestrians, people at outdoor cafes and even a loud siren from a passing fire truck. Of course, what was cooler than the Big Apple was the fact that people could eat outside and stroll around in long sleeve T-shirts in the middle of January. Yes, we suffer through the summers here in Austin, but in winter, we get to enjoy these outdoor café sitting days. Frank had his new Olympus E-P3, while I carried my trusty E-PL1. Ironically, Kirk had his Nikon V1. Ironic because, Kirk, through his blog, had influenced me to get in the Olympus Pen gear and he most likely influenced Frank too. Maybe Frank and I are just a step behind Master Kirk. Maybe in a year or so we too will be sporting the small Nikons. Of course, by then Kirk will be at the forefront of the next big camera trend.
I knew where we were headed since Kirk and Frank are big coffee drinkers. The Caffe Medici at the base of Austin’s swankiest Condo, the Austonian. And though I didn’t drink the stuff, I knew the company will be interesting and the conversation would be good. Of course we talk about photography, the industry, hardware trends, the photography business as well as about blogging. We shift into other topics, take pictures of the interesting people that surround us and then drift back into conversation. Photography has been a source of creativity and challenge but equally important has been the friends I’ve made along the way. Meeting people face to face during photo walks and the eating and drinking that follows has truly improved my well-being. I’ve greatly expand my circle of friends. I read once that men, unlike women, tend not to have enough friends and social interactions, especially as they grow older. Pre-photography, that was probably true for me too.
Beyond enjoying the photographic craft and making new friends, the quest to make images have gotten me out of my old suburban patterns. You know the one where you get into the hermetically sealed car, open the garage door and drive the suburban loop roads to the industrial park. Very little interaction with real people. Now, I make frequent trips to downtown Austin, where on foot, I get to experience the real life. It is not always pretty or controlled like the suburbs but there is an authenticity that the new simulated pseudo-cities called life-style malls lack. You know these new malls, the ones that are outdoor and have fake town squares in them to give you the impression that they are real urban places. Now I walk the streets of downtown Austin, observing, capturing images and if lucky run into friends and strike-up conversations in cafes — even if I don’t drink the coffee.
Here is Kirk’s post about our chance downtown encounter.
Also, here are a few more images that I shot between our conversation at the Cafe. I used both the 20mm f1.7 lens and the 45mm f1.8 lenses on the Olympus E-PL1. Please make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image and hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
New Year’s Photo Resolutions
As a the calendar flips over again to start a new year, I started thinking of what 2012 my bring for my photography and blogging. I’m generally not much into New Year’s resolutions. I figure, why wait for the beginning of the year to start a new habit? If something is worth changing, doesn’t it make sense to change it immediately? I won’t bore you with non-photographic stuff. I did want to discuss observations and changes that have occurred in my photographic realm and my guess at the future direction of these trends.
I talked about some of this in a post called Canon losing the buzz, why I’m not interested but I’ve noticed this year that my interest in using my big Canon SLR has been decreasing. The initial trend started more than a year ago when I got my first mirrorless EVIL camera, the Sony NEX-5. I would carry by NEX-5 and the Canon 7D along on photo walks. I discovered, however, that the small Sony camera gave me a freedom of composition and expression that I didn’t have with the larger camera. Mid-year this year. I purchased the Olympus E-PL1, initially to play with and to get a color and exposure that I wasn’t getting on my Sony. It turned out that the slightly clunky E-PL1 especially with the Lumix 20mm f1.7 lens have become my go to camera for casual shooting. When I want a camera to make snaps of may family, the Olympus is in tow. When I want slightly more “serious” images from my photowalks, I still press the Olympus into service. The 40mm equivalent format is really easy to shoot but it also challenges me to see and make interesting compositions. I no longer, just relay upon super-wide images with HDR enhancements to make interesting shots. I’m hoping to create worthwhile images even with a lens that has a normal view and with a single exposure. I’m not sure if I’m succeeding or not but I’m starting to see changes in my newer images. I also feel more freedom when I’m no longer tendered to a larger camera and a tripod. I can move around easily, unencumbered and really explore alternate compositions. For 2012, I’m going to continue with this style. Less weight, more flexibility and a simpler way of shooting.
I also learned that skills and ability drop quickly. The downside of all this shooting with my small cameras is my loss of familiarity with my Canon DSLR. When I used the 7D all the time, I knew the controls and could make adjustments quickly. Now, when I pickup the camera, I’m sluggish and I need to search through my brain to set the controls. Recently, during my son’s school performance and at the Christmas gift opening, I broke out the good old 7D. I immediately noticed that my handling skills have dropped off and it took me a bit of fiddling to get the shots that I used to get with ease. Bounce flashes off the ceiling weren’t exposed right. I eventually got dialed back in but my hard learned skills were fading quicker than I imagined. While I’m planning to use the smaller cameras more than ever, I must remember to use my Canon and keep my skills refreshed. That, unfortunately, is the downside of having several different cameras — different interfaces. I need to rotate though my cameras to keep their usage parameters fresh in my head.
I’m still looking for the elusive camera/video multi-function camera, maybe 2012 will be the year. When I bought my NEX-5 back in 2010, I thought this might be the camera that combines high quality still images with an easily usable, auto-focusing video camera. As I wrote in The Sony NEX-5 Review and the new NEX-5n there were a few limitations with the NEX-5 that ultimately disappointed. The NEX-5n has addressed much of my frustrations but I’ve decided to wait. There are rumors of a new Fujifilm EVIL camera coming out, there is always a chance that Canon might finally address this high quality mirrorless market. This market is rapidly changing and I’m excited to see what is in store for this coming year. What will the successor to the NEX-5n be like? Will a Olympus E-P4 come out with a better low light sensor and better video? Will Nikon release large aperture primes (at least f2.0 or better) for their Nikon 1 line? Of course, If I do end up getting yet another camera, I exacerbate the issue I talked about in the previous paragraph. I add yet another interface to the array of interfaces that I need to remember.
Shifting gears to social media, I’ve noticed that in 2011, keeping up with my photo friends have increasing been difficult. It used to be simple for me. Everyone I knew was on Flickr. Now people have scattered to the different social medial islands that compete for our attention. Google+ is the new shiny site that has pulled many photographers away from Flickr and Twitter. There is also that large Facebook world and lone island that is personal blogs. I have two blogs, this one which has longer form posts and mostlyfotos which is my daily photoblog. I’ve developed these sites over the last year and a half and put significant effort in to them. And while I like how they are shaping up, concentrating too much on my site isolates me from my online friends. This year, I need to return to my roots, somewhat. I need to post more on Flickr again. When I return there, it feel like I’m back in the neighborhood in which I was born. Some of my old friends are still around and posting just as much. Some of the gang have left for greener pastures and are no longer around. I probably can’t spend as much time as I originally did a couple of years ago but I need to show up more often on Flickr. I’m still unsure of the Google+ world. While I have posted some to G+, I really have not spent the time to make too many new friends. I’ve bumped into people I know from Flickr, which is aways a pleasant surprise. It feels like running into an elementary school friend in the large out-of-state University. Social media seem to be changing quicker than cameras so I know I won’t have this figured out in 2012. I will just have to make adjustments that seem to make sense.
Finally, I’ve learned that writing is a skill like photography. I don’t know if my writing has improved any over the last couple of years but I find that I can craft together posts quicker than before. I also found that I have no shortage of topics and ideas that I can write about. Maybe, if I keep at this, my writing skill will continue to improve and I’ll be able to crank out these posts. Of course, blog post creation time has to complete with photography, photo processing and organizing not to mention all the rest of my life activities, so it is always an uphill battle to find time. I hope 2012 will bring more interesting and useful posts to anyone that my stumble upon my blog and my photography. I hope you all have a great 2012.
Happy New Year
Olympus 45mm f1.8 Lens Test at the Driskill
I just download some photographs that I took earlier in the week with my new Olympus 45mm f1.8 and I was so excited by the results that I decided to do a quick blog post. In the post, Canon losing the buzz, why I’m not interested that I posted 2 weeks ago, I talked about my quandary about buying either the Olympus 45mm f.8 or the new Fujifilm X10 camera. Well, from this post, you can tell I went with the Olympus lens. I’ll go into the details of why I chose the lens over the camera in a future post but today, I wanted to show you the results I’m getting with this lens. It was the first real lens test I did outside my house in low light.
This past Wednesday, I went downtown with my friend Mike to capture some holiday images and get together for some dinner. I wanted a picture of the Driskill Hotel Christmas tree, which I’ve shot for the last several years. You can see that shot I got, along with some other noteworthy trees in my previous post, Three Christmas Trees for the Holiday Season. I used my Sony NEX-5 for that wide-angle but I also brought along my Olympus E-PL1 with the 45mm f1.8 lens to give it a workout. The results are spectacular and I’m very excited by the first real test results. The nice shallow depth of field and the fantastic bokeh (the quality of the out of focus areas) was what I was hoping for with this lens. So far, I am not disappointed.
I took a bunch more photos with this lens that night but I just wanted to show the images from the Driskill Tree in this posting. All of the images were shot at ISO 800 and wide open at f1.8.
Make sure to click on a photograph to see a larger image. Hover over the photo to see the exposure details.
A 45mm lens on a micro 4/3 camera like the Olympus has an 35mm equivalent of 90mm. You just double the focal length to get the equivalent. At 90mm, you get a fair amount of compression, which you can see above. The distances between objects are “compressed” so they appear close together than you see in reality. This is one of the reasons why a 90mm lens makes for a great portrait lens. It compresses the facial features so that you don’t have noses protruding as much.
I love this ornament. It seems so personalized for the Driskill. That’s also a picture of the Late President Johnson and his wife, Lady Bird, in the background. At f1.8 and at this distance, the depth of field is quite shallow. You can even see that the entire note card is not even in complete focus, with only a slice of sharp focus in the center of the card. The lens appears to be very sharp even at its largest Aperture. Too bad my Canon prime lenses aren’t this sharp.
And finally, here is an closeup of the entire tree in portrait orientation.
The Olympus E-PL1 captures a simple carnival
I took my Olympus E-PL1, my current camera of choice, out for yet another photo event this past weekend. Two weekends ago it was the Dia de los Muertos Parade in downtown Austin. This time, it was something a bit smaller and calmer. One of those simple carnivals that seems to pop-up on parking lots on the outskirts of town or in the suburbs. This one, took place on at the Dell Diamond, the AAA baseball stadium for the Round Rock Express. I wanted to take my friend, Mike, out for his birthday and he suggested a short photography exercise before we went to dinner. Over the last year, both Mike and I, who both own big Canon DSLRs, have being going light. Often times, opting to take just a small camera with us, instead of the bigger iron and the assorted lenses and accessories. Mike’s been putting his Fujifilm X100 through its paces. My lightweight setup is the E-PL1 with very compact Lumix 20mm f1.7 pancake lens. Sunset was at around 6:47 so we met just after 6 pm to capture the golden hour and the equally nice “blue hour” that takes place after sunset.
Please click on an image to see a larger version
Many of you might be familiar with the golden hour, the time just before sunset or after sunrise which has a wonderful golden, warm light and makes for great looking photographs. The low angle of the sun and the softer light creates images that are warmer and smoother than the harsh mid-day light. The blue hour maybe a term that is less familiar to most people. And unlike the golden hour which may last an hour in length, the blue hour is considerably shorter and not anywhere near an hour, at least here in Texas. So what is the blue hour? It is the time of day after sunset or before sunrise when the sky becomes a bright and vibrant blue color. I love shooting at this time, particularly in urban environments where there are lots of warm, man-made yellow-ish lights. The blue color of the sky and the yellow lights make an excellent color contrast that, I think, works particularly well. A little research reveals that the term blue hour originated from the French expression heure bleue according to Wikipedia. I don’t know if this gorgeous blue period actually lasts an hour in France but here in the Austin area, it lasts maybe 15 minutes. For me, there is a bit of scrambling during these 15 minutes to get my perfect shots and then the magic is gone. The sky increasingly turns darker and once it turn black, the mood and color becomes completely different.
This simple carnival up in Round Rock and my nimble and light setup with my Olympus E-PL1 was particularly effective to capture the optimum Blue Hour color. First, unlike larger carnivals like the one at the Austin Rodeo, this small carnival allowed me to visit many rides very quickly. It didn’t take me much time to walk from one end to the other. Having the lightweight camera setup without a tripod was also a boon. No precious time wasted setting up a tripod. I can shoot multiple angles quickly and move on to the next exciting attraction. When nature has a 15 minute timer, every minute counts. I’m satisfied with the results. The Olympus and the fantastic Lumix 20mm lens allowed me to record high quality images at ISO 800 and below. Instead of wide-angle, long exposure images I took previously with my larger Canon 7D, this time it was all about seeing interesting compositions quickly. I’m trying to go light and train my eye to see images worth capturing. Some came out great and others were less exciting but with much practice I think I can get better. I feel that the kind of photographs I’m making now has changed quite a bit, especially compared to few years ago — hopefully they are for the better. Having a small camera with a fixed focal length (no zoom) can be liberating, training the eye and allowing the photographer to move faster when necessary. While the carefully composed tripod shots are still important, its nice to shoot in a different way from time to time.
By 7:30, Mike and I were done. The sky was already too dark and there wasn’t enough ambient light at the carnival to take the kind of images we wanted. We packed it in and went to dinner. We talked about life, photography and blogging among other things. It was a nice birthday dinner and a fun time shooting with a good friend.
Here are a bunch more photographs from the carnival.
These first two images were taken during the golden hour, when I first got to the carnival.
As the sun set, the blue of the sky started to come alive. I shot the starship photo at 6:53pm about 6 minutes after sunset. I shot the next image of the ferris wheel at 7pm, pretty much at the peak of the blue hour. The third photo of Crystal Lil’s was a couple of minutes after that. You can tell how quickly the light changes. Of course the direction that I face is also a factor. I was facing north for Spaceship 4000, east for the ferris wheel and roughly west for Crystal Lil’s.
As I’ve done lately, I wanted to take a candid portrait of a someone interesting on the street. Sandy had this colorful mohawk wig that attracted my attention. She was selling the souvenirs at a both in the middle of the action. I find that the 20mm Lumix makes a great environmental portrait lens. Just the right field of view to include the surrounding area and just enough depth of field to emphasize the person and nicely blur the background.
Finally, as the blue hour passed and things got dark, I shifted my photography to capturing shadows or shooting in brighter areas. We didn’t stay too long after sunset but here are two more images that I captured before Mike and I went off off to dinner.
Dia de los Muertos with the Olympus E-PL1
One camera, one lens.
I think as a photographer, it is a challenge to use just one lens. I feel like it is a safety net to have more than one lens and sometimes I even bring more than one camera with me. However, to challenge my photographic eye and to travel lighter, I’ve been reducing the amount of equipment that I bring to photo events. Here is a bunch of photographs that I took yesterday at the Dia de los Muertos (Day of the Dead) event that happened in downtown Austin, Texas. I took them all with the Olympus E-PL1 and the Panasonic Lumix 20mm f1.7 lens. The Lumix is a prime lens so it does not zoom, it only has one focal length at 20mm which on the Olympus it is equivalent to 40mm in the standard 35mm format. The fact that this lens does not zoom, I think, makes it even more challenging, but that is part of the fun.
Please click on an image to see a larger version
The E-PL1 is my newest camera and my current favorite. This small camera takes some fantastic photographs and the 20mm Lumix lens is one of my favorites. I’m working on my Olympus E-PL1 review right now and it should be coming soon. I’m also planning to write more about the Lumix 20mm lens. Until then, here are some photographs that I took with this camera and lens combo. In addition to candid action shots during the parade, I also took some portraits of interesting people who I met during the event. Asking strangers if I can take their photo is another one of the challenges that I currently taking. I wrote about his in a blog post called Overcoming the Fear of Photo Rejection about a year ago. Lately, I’ve been doing this more often as I see interesting subjects during my photographic travels.
The thing with the 20mm lens is that you have to be decently close to make an interesting image. It is considered a normal lens which means it’s neither a wide-angle or a telephoto. This 40mm equivalent lens is similar to what the human eye sees. it would certainly be easier to use a longer lens but I think, if you are willing to get close, the 40mm lens has a really natural look. You don’t get the image compression that a telephoto lens creates. I think it feels like you are right there within the parade. Consequently to get some of these parade shots, I had to “join” the parade and get in the middle of it. I was not standing on the side lines to shoot most of these images. I know I would not be able to do this in every parade however, this one seemed casual enough that I figured I can get away with it.
I hope you enjoy the images and remember, for a photographic challenge, you might consider. 1. bringing only one camera and one lens. Extra credit for using a prime lens instead of a zoom. 2. Get into the action, if the situation permits. 3. Ask people, strangers, if its ok to take their pictures.
Here are a bunch more photographs from this event.
Everything is a Photo Opportunity
Last Wednesday, after a downtown photowalk with my friend Mike, we had a late dinner at Hopdoddy. Joining a bunch of restaurants in the trendy SoCo area of Austin, Hopdoddy is an upscale burger bar that also serves beer, wine and mix drinks. Even on a week night at 8:30 the place was packed. I had my current camera of choice, the Olympus E-PL1 with the Lumix 20mm f1.7 lens, all warmed up after a night of photowalking. The camera and lens make a fantastic street photography combination that I’m really enjoying right now. As we sat down to enjoy are delicious burgers, Mike and I talked photography, cameras and the challenges of life. He was sporting his new Fujifilm X100 which I eyed with interest.
Everything is a photo opportunity. When you have a daily photoblog like mostlyfotos you need to take a lot of photographs, all the time, to have ready material to post. Of course, not all photos make the cut so I need to have extra just in case. But my ultimate goal is not necessarily to fill a blog with images but it is to use the chance to practice my passion and craft. I’m hoping that by shooting all the time, I get to fine tune my brain into seeing better. To find interesting things or try to capture a moment in time. It’s the opportunity to overcome shyness and ask strangers if I can take their photograph. I’m not sure I’m getting better at this but I hope I am. Maybe I’m just annoying the people around me or maybe sometimes, in some rare cases, I might come up with an image that makes me happy and brings some enjoyment to others.
Here are some images that I captured at the restaurant. They are not works of art and not all of them will make it into mostlyfotos, however, they do help support this little narrative. I’ll leave my outside photowalk images for another post or you will see them mix in to my stream of photos at a future date. It was a good night. The food was fantastic, it was wonderful to catchup with a good friend and I enjoyed training my brain to see. Thanks for stopping by. I hope you have a chance to record the mundane, daily life around you because it’s not only the special events that make a photo opportunity. Everything is a photo opportunity.
Using a Lens Baby Composer on an Olympus E-PL1
On this particularly hot summer in Austin, Texas, my son was taking some swimming lessons at an Austin pool. Ramsey park pool is a small public pool in a quiet neighborhood surrounded by small but nicely kept up houses. I grabbed my newest photographic toy, a Olympus E-PL1 camera that I recently purchased along with a Lens Baby I recently receive from a friend. A Lens Baby is a fun, special purpose lens that is designed to create distorted images. There are many models but there is only one that works on the Olympus micro 4/3 standard, the Composer with Tilt Transformer. This model couples a tilting mechanism along with a manual focus system that allows you to interchange many Lens Baby optics. Also, you can remove Lens Baby composer section and mount Nikon lens to the tilting mechanism. The photographs on this post used the standard issue Composer with Tilt transformer which comes with the double glass optic.
Some photographers really get into the Lens Baby lenses because of their creative control. They produces a very different look, as you can see, from a standard lens. In some ways, you can get a similar funky, out of focus or distorted look that you can get with plastic lens cameras such as the Holgas. I’ve always been curious about these lenses but never had the opportunity to play with them until recently. These lenses are strictly manual focus which is also a big change for me. I’ve been spoiled by fully automatic focusing lenses so this is a bit of a learning curve with the Lens Baby. On a Olympus, the 40mm lens acts like a 80mm when accounting for the 2x crop factor. This is prime lens, not a zoom so you are locked into a 80mm point of view. There are, however, still two 2 rings on the Lens Baby. The black one acts as a manual focusing ring the other silver ring loosens the tilting mechanism. The double glass optic included in the package creates an area of sharp focus surrounded by distorted fuzzy area. The tilting mechanism allows you to move the sweet spot of focus from the center to other parts of the frame. The aperture can also be changed but that involves a bit of effort by changing aperture disks.
I use the LCD on the back of the camera to focus but this is only good enough for rough focusing. To fine tune the focus I hit the magnify button (set to 7x magnification). All of the images on this post were taken at an Aperture of f4. However, possibly because of the distortion effects of the lens, I found that even at f4, the depth of field was quite shallow. A precise touch was required to achieve sharp focus. It took me a couple of hours to get the hang of the lens’ tilting and focusing mechanism. A trick that helped me focus better with this lens is to move the zoom box to match the location of the tilt. For example, when the Composer is set straight and perfectly centered, I keep the green zoom box on the center of the LCD. The zoom box, as I call it, is the area that gets magnified when I hit the magnify button. If I tilt the lens baby to the right like I did in the Life Guard #1 photo, I also move the green zoom box to the right to approximately match where I think the sweet spot is located. This will take a bit of experimentation and practice but I’ve gotten the hang of it pretty quickly. With the zoom square set I can hit the magnify button to quickly fine tune focus. I usually zoom out to the standard view after focusing to do some final tweaks to the composition before hitting the shutter. I have, however, also taken some photos in the magnified view if I really needed capture the image quickly.
The build quality of the Lens Baby is quite good, better than I expected. All of the components are made with solid metal and plastic parts. The zoom ring is decently smooth, and feels better than the standard Canon lenses that I have. It has a substantial feel especially compared to the very plastic feeling Olympus kit lens. I get the feeling the lens will hold together and give years of reliable service. The only area that feels a bit diminished is the tiling mechanism. The ball joint that moves and tilts is not always smooth and at times binds a bit. It makes fine control and precise movement slightly more difficult. I noticed on the Lens Baby website that there is now a Composer Pro which claims to have an upgraded swivel ball and focus mechanism. Seems like Lens Baby realized there is an opportunity for a high quality “pro” product. Despite the rougher adjustments of the swivel area, the product is very useable. Ultimately, it does not take away from the capability of the product.
While I’m not ready to do a serious portrait session or landscape with this lens, I have to admit it kind of fun. It is a bit like iPhone photography with the various post processing effects — you end up with photographs that differ from the standard look. Unlike the iPhone, however, you set the look when the you click the shutter. The effects are true optical effects so there is no going back like you can in computer based post processing. While you lose the ability to undo the effect, you gain by getting a high quality image.
I’m still using a digital camera, but somehow the tilting and distorting lens gives an analog feel. I think it’s a great lens to take along when you just want to have fun and take photography less seriously. It’s also an easy way to achieve a different look and point of view, particularly if you end up taking photos of the same old subjects. The $350 list price seems a bit high and with some online discounts the price falls just below $300. Whether the fun and creative aspects of the Lens Baby are enough to justify its cost is up to you. However, for the price, there are certainly other lenses that I would buy first. I can see bringing this lens on future downtown Austin photo walks to put a new spin on an increasing familiar location — a place that I’ve visited extensively over the last couple of years. And when you are through acquiring all the “practical” must have lenses, you maybe ready for a lens that brings whimsy, playfulness and maybe a bit more creativity to your photographs. Ultimately, if a tool helps to unlock greater creativity, maybe that tool becomes priceless.
About the images
I’ve amped up the color on these photos (excluding the product shot) more than normal. To me the playful distortions seem to look good with the corresponding boost in color. All photographs were taken with the Olympus E-PL1 at ISO 100 with a fast shutter speed since it was bright and sunny. Exposures on Life Guard #1, #2 and #3 were boosted by 1/3 stop. #4 was set with zero exposure compensation. I used the f4 aperture disk in the Lens Baby with the double lens optic. The photographs were post processed with Apple’s Aperture 3 with increases in color saturation and a bit of sharpening.
Note: Please click on the image above to see a larger version.
Practice and the Zen of Urban Photography
I practice many different types of photography. You are probably most familiar with my urban landscapes, if you have perused my gallery. I also have taken some portraits, shot some events, dabbled in street photography and acted as mini sports photographer, taking photos of my kid’s soccer game. Each type of photography has a different pace. A different set of techniques are required to successfully capture the best images. When it comes to urban and nature landscape photography, there is a lot of time to sit back and wait. Waiting for the optimal light and color. Unlike some other types of photography, in landscapes you can not control the light or the environment. You have to frame your scene and wait until events unfold, patiently watching for the peak. I’ve noticed that as I get more experienced in photography, I slow down even more and taken in the zen of the place. I was reminded of this recently, as I watched what appeared to be a newbie photographer frantically shoot and adjust settings on her camera. I was calmly sitting there and watched in amazement as she took photographs non-stop of a scene that barely changed. Keep in mind that there was no action, we were both photographing a courthouse at sunset.
I observed this animated scene on the peaceful and historic town square in Georgetown, Texas. Many of my urban scenes are of larger cities and I decided to add a smaller town to my portfolio of urban landscapes. Georgetown is a small town located about 20 miles north of Austin along Interstate 35. I arrived a bit before 7pm and since sunset was at 8:35, I had plenty of time to scout the area. The area of interest is not too large and I spend about an hour shooting the historic courthouse as well as the small Victorian storefronts that form the perimeter of the town square. The time was well spent since I also got to further train my compositional eye with my super-wide lens — a lens that I usually use for these purposes. Right off the square I found an old-time movie theater with some nice lights. Check. This theater will look even better at night. I also mentally noted some nice compositions of the centerpiece courthouse building. However, truth be told, I was there mainly to wait for the best light the occurs just before and after sunset.
Around 8:15, I strolled to a spot on the square that had a view of the courthouse and the coming sunset. A young woman was there with her camera on tripod shooting away. I didn’t talk to her much but I did find out that she was taking a photography course. She was constantly shooting, adjusting the lens and playing with her settings on the back of her DSLR. What fascinated and confused me was why she was going through this frantic pace for nearly 45 minutes. It was a though she was shooting a fashion show or some other action packed event. I setup my tripod, tested a half a dozen different frames of the historic building and settled down for a relaxing wait. Rain has been rare around Central Texas lately and with the worst drought in ages so I knew there weren’t going to be any interesting clouds. Usually without clouds, sunsets are not nearly as interesting. When there are no clouds, the other interesting photograph to make is of the “Blue Hour” which starts around 20 minutes after sunset. The “Blue Hour” which only lasts for around 15 minutes around here is when the sky turns a vibrant and deep blue during the twilight between light and dark. It makes for a great backdrop to urban landscapes. In find that in really large cities with large skylines, a night scene with black skies can also work nicely, primarily because there is so much ambient man-made light. However, in smaller towns and in smaller cities like Austin, I find night, with its black sky, to be really boring for urban architecture. There just isn’t enough buildings that are lit up to make a dynamic image. Hence, I find that “Blue Hour” is the best and last chance to make some interesting photographs of buildings.
During the 45 minute wait, until the ideal blue sky, I peacefully sat there and waited. I took in the calm of the small town. I did shoot a few frames every 10 minutes or so to capture the changing light as sunset approached and passed. But more than anything, I was watching the scene of the maniacal landscape photographer. I was tempted a few times to offer some help or suggestions but she seem too rushed and harried. So much so that I just didn’t want to talk to her. She didn’t seem like she was enjoying the process and seemed frustrated with the situation. To be fair, since I didn’t know her and what she was trying to do, maybe her frantic pace was justified. I don’t think I was ever quite as frantic when I started photography but I do remember that I was not nearly as calm as I am how. Back then, since I didn’t have a good idea of what was going to happen at sunset and “Blue Hour”, I constantly checked my settings and reframed the scene. After some experience and practice, I now have a good idea of what and how I want to frame. I have ideas in my head for the type of image I want to create but I try to keep an open mind just in case something better presents itself. Nowadays, it is a waiting game for the right light and color in the sky. I like the contrast between the man-made, artificial lights and the fading light from nature. As I anticipate the optimal conditions, I begin to take more frames. Maybe once every minute or so. After I got what I think were decent images, I quickly moved to two other locations around the square to capture those places with this deep blue sky. This is where the scouting I did an hour earlier, really paid off. I quickly got another point of view of the courthouse with a statue out front. I also went back to that old movie theater with the nice lights. By 9:30 it was dark and satisfied that I got what I wanted, I headed home.
Note: Please click on the image above to see a larger version.
Strobist + HDR: Ultimate Buzzword Compliant Portrait
In my previous post, I talked about a wide-angle HDR portrait that I created in downtown Austin. For this post, I decide to one up my earlier post by adding yet another trendy photographic buzzword, Strobist, to the already “trendy” HDR photography. This is all in good fun but I’m not doing this just to throw in buzzwords. I really wanted to use these techniques to create an interesting image. I’ve talked a lot about HDR on this blog. Strobist, is something new that I’m starting to dabble in. It refers to a photographic technique which uses small battery-powered strobes (Flashes) to take portraits. The strobist movement, made popular by the strobist blog, has gained a large following since it attempts to eliminate big and bulky studio lights with portable flash units.
I took the photograph above on the same night as the photo that I featured in my previous post. I shot it about 1 hour and 20 minutes later in a different alleyway, 2 blocks away. We had the same cast helping out. Mike was also shooting that night but was assisting with this shot. We have Model Eight and Fets doing the Street Fighter scene. And the wild and colorful makeup was created by Allie. What differed in this photograph was the use of the flashes. We used two of them, radio controlled, on either side of the models, just out of range of the camera’s frame. While the earlier HDR portrait was done purely in existing light (both natural and man-made street lighting), I enhanced this image with the flashes which lit up the models.
The technique used to capture the images as well as the post processing work is exactly the same as described in the blog post: Going beyond the ordinary with HDR Portraits. Because it was a lot darker in this scene, I decided to use the strobes to light up the models. Other than using the flashes, the same considerations and techniques were applied in creating this image. In this case, I photographed the models at ISO 800 at 0.4 second and blended that image into my 3 exposure HDR to create the final look.
I like this image for several reasons. First, because of the way it is framed, both models do not show much wide-angle distortion. They are both kept in the center of the frame and since their arms and legs are also near the center, they don’t have any limbs that are wildly exaggerated in length. I also like this gritty alleyway and the contrast of the old brick walls to the modern skyscrapers in the distance. The tall building, called the Austonian, is the tallest building in Austin. It acts as a visual anchor at the end of the alley. Finally, purely by accident, model Eight’s purple wig nicely matches the purple neon and purple reflections on the walls.
Lets contrast this portrait to the previous. Certainly, the location is not the same but more importantly, the two styles of lighting gives a completely different feel. This image is darker and the flash gives it a sharper, chiseled photographic look. On the other hand, the ambient light of the earlier image has a more subtle, moodier feel, looking almost like a painting. What do you think? Which do you like better?
Note: Please click on the image above to see a larger version.
Going beyond the ordinary with HDR Portraits
Readers of this blog will probably know that I use HDR to bring a level of reality or hyper-realty to some of my photographs. Most of the time, I tend to keep the HDR on the subtle side, opting to slightly enhance color, dynamic range or textures. Depending on the subject, I strengthen the HDR effect to enhance certain objects for effect. Usually these objects are shinny which HDR tends to make shinier or old, rusted items which HDR tends to age even more. However, recently, some of my friends and I have thought of using HDR with portraits to create a new and different look.
I can’t claim that combining HDR with portraits is something new. While it’s not common, I know other people have created similar images. Nevertheless, it is something that I have not done before and I thought it would be interesting to try. I’ve done many wide-angle, urban landscape HDRs. Why not combines these gritty urban images with models for different kind of look. My friend, Mike, who I’ve practiced portraits with lately, also seem to be interested in this experiment. Model Eight, as she prefers to be called was also on board. In fact, she was thrilled enough with the idea that she enlisted help from another model, Fets and a makeup artist, Allie.
After running some preliminary tests, I realized that there were certainly challenges to achieve the look I wanted. Creating the HDRs were easy since I’ve done this for a while now, but what would be the best way to add the people into the scene. I wanted an evening shot to catch the nice natural light as well as the man-made urban lighting. Unfortunately, exposures in these conditions are long enough that people tend to come out blurred from movement. Even if the people tried to stay perfectly still, I’ve noticed that shutter speeds longer than about 1/2 second will introduce motion blur. I wanted the models to be crisply shot with the HDR goodness surrounding them. This meant that I would have to shoot my HDR exposures without the models and then blend a separate photo with the models into the scene. Also, with only a few rare exceptions, HDRs of people tend not to look good. HDR tends to give a coal miner look to its subjects, a look most people, especially women I suspect would not appreciate. To make post-processing easier, its preferable to have the exposure of the photograph with the model, look about the same as the middle exposure of a multi-shot HDR. In the photograph above, I shot 3 photographs at -2, 0 and +2 exposure compensation for the HDR. That means, I want to shoot my model at an exposure similar to my 0 exposure compensation HDR image. My HDR photos are usually shot at ISO 100, which made my 0 EV shot 30 seconds long. Of course this is much too long for the models to stay still. I ended up shooting the model shot at ISO 1600 at 1/2 second to roughly approximate my target image. Of course all of this was shot on tripod to keep everything steady and aligned. The HDR processing is more over the top than usual for me, but its was done on purpose. It’s part of creating that wacky hyper-real urban scene that I was looking for.
The other challenge was using a super wide-angle lens. These lens create a lot of distortion, especially around the edges. While it’s one thing to distort buildings, it’s entirely different with people. I’ve generally try to keep the people in the center of the frame, particularly their faces. Distorting limbs, sometimes adds an interesting effect and is definitely preferable (for most people, I imagine) than distorting their face. In the image above, Model Eight’s long arms and legs look even longer than normal. However, because of this type of fun image with her playful makeup, I figured that the distortion adds to the feel of the entire image.
So there you have it. A run down and a quick behind the scenes of my first public HDR portrait. I think there is a real interesting quality to the image and it’s certainly far from the ordinary. The combination of the model’s makeup, the super wide-angle framing, the urban location and the HDR all combine to create a different look. Although it may not be everyone’s cup of tea, I had fun creating the photograph and I think it’s essential to break out of the ordinary at times. I will still shoot conventional portraits but for some people, imagery like this maybe something they prefer. What do you think?
Note: Please click on the image above to see a larger version.
A Visit to Seaholm, a Majestic Downtown Power Plant
Driving into downtown Austin on Cesar Chavez Street (first street) from the west, it’s hard not to miss the large power plant by the river. It’s a solid concrete structure and an under utilized landmark. Non-operational since 1989, it has never generated any power during the 20 years that I have lived in Austin. It does have a bright red sign that adorns the side and some blue accents above the entrances — the only signs of life at this deteriorating urban structure. Photographs I’ve seen of the inside have only increased my curiosity of what is hidden within its aging walls. Recently, I’ve had a wonderful opportunity to take a look inside and photograph its interior for a few hours. This opportunity came about as a result of photographing the Holly Street Power Plant a couple of months earlier. A friend of mine, Therese, with connections to the city heard about my trip to the Holly Plant. After showing my Holly Street blog entry and expressing a desire to have a similar access to Seaholm, I was lucky enough to be introduced to Gloria who works for the City of Austin. Gloria was kind enough to allow myself and a few photographer friends access to Seaholm and even took time out of her weekend to open up the place. What follows are some photographs and impressions of this grand concrete structure.
Architecturally, the differences between Holly Street and Seaholm are significant. Holly is a newer more utilitarian facility made primarily of metal. It appears functional like a warehouse or factory and does not have architectural flourishes. It is extensively surrounded by a maze of metal superstructures and pipes that look complex. It reminds me of a densely packed machine with its guts exposed. The generator rooms is barely visible with all the plumbing that surrounds and feeds the beast. The Seaholm Power plant is clearly from a different era, though surprisingly only built 10 years before the start of the Holly plant in 1960. Externally, it looks like a solid art deco office building with giant smoke stacks connected at its rear. A bank windows in the front and side clearly adorn the main building which is the major focal point of the facility. Much of its complexity is hidden somewhere as if care was taken to make a power plant as beautiful as it can be without losing its function. Walking inside the main generator room is like entering a huge temple — a temple to industry and to the modern world. It was clearly built to impress with its towering concrete walls and ceiling and ample clerestory windows. While the outside is nicely designed, the inside is what really shines in my book, as you can see from the photograph above.
The color palate at Seaholm is more muted than at Holly which has a red-painted floor. However, Seaholm’s concrete creates some excellent texture, further enhanced with my use of HDR (high dynamic range) photography. As usual, I leave my HDR processing on the light side, opting in this case to enhance texture and detail and not dynamic range. I softened some shadows but chose to retain enough to keep an interplay between light and dark. For readers unfamiliar with HDR, it is a photographic process were multiple images at different brightness levels are taken and later combined with software to form a single image. I usually use 3 photographs for my HDR but recently have experimented with combining more images, especially in scenes with a large amount of dynamic range.
Photographically, much of the grander remains, though we were slightly disappointed that the main generators have been removed. Holly street was interesting to photograph since the generators and control panels are still in place. It looks as though it was just closed one day and all the power plant equipment was kept in place. Seaholm is different. The city has planned for years to redevelop this property. Much of the large industrial components have been removed long ago. What remains is the impressive concrete shell that some day will be, hopefully, repurposed for some modern function. In fact, Seaholm has been used for parties during the SXSW events and other large gatherings. While my goal at Holly was to document its machinery and plumbing before being torn down, my focus at Seaholm was to celebrate the architecture and photograph its bones before redevelopment commences. The unexpected treasure at Seaholm is the dark underbelly below the main floor. We’ll start the tour on the main level, which I call the generator room. The photograph at the top was taken far end of this room. We entered the building at other end, near the wall with the bank of windows. You can see the giant openings surrounded by safety rails which once housed the generators. These openings lead to an underground world a couple of levels deep, which we will explore later in the blog.
We entered the building near the bank of windows on the east wall. It was a little after 10am when we started the photo tour and I caught the sun streaming in from the east. With and the band of clerestory windows near the ceiling, the windows throughout the building, the space was pleasantly bright. Unlike the Holly Street Plant, Seaholm has a light and airy feel. I really like the ceiling detail of this building and the grooved channels on the ceiling adds a nice pattern that leads the eye through the building.
Click here to see all my images from the Seaholm Power Plant. You can also click on each of the photos to see a larger version.
The mechanical wall, for lack of a better term, is really simple and clean in this building. You can see the grey stairs and repeating metal structures on the left side. I don’t know if a lot of piping and mechanical structures were removed along with the generators but the place has a really simple and organized feel.
Go down a flight of stairs and you enter the concrete canyons that once housed the generators. This metal catwalk spanned some nicely textured concrete pillars. I used HDR to enhance the concrete a bit more than usual. I really like the worn texture and though most people might think of concrete as a cold and impersonal material, when enhanced in this way, I think it takes on a bit of a patina and has the feel of weathered wood. The area is well-lit from above but you begin to see the dark recesses that surround the two level below the main floor. The image below is from the lowest level which I’ve brightened a bit. I was attracted to the light and shadows cast from the concrete pillars with the light that is filtering down two levels. I imagine this space was quite a bit darker when the generators were in place.
Here is another image of the same area framed but through a round port-hole. As you can see the wall has some great details and strange insulation or building materials sandwiched within the concrete layers. The foreground wall was quite dark and the HDR techniques really brought out the details of the wall will preserving the view though the circular opening. I think this is an excellent use of this technique and I believe this is an image that would not be possible without using HDR. The last photograph from down below is the stair case with the red glow. Located on the south-east corner, I saw this reddish glow from the other side. In a mostly monochromatic building, this color really stood out and got my curiosity going. It turned out that the neat color was created by light coming down the stairwell bounced off the red colored floor.
Unlike Holly, where the place was dead silent, Seaholm still had life. There was a persistent hum heard through the building. The lower levels with its many dark rooms, long expanses of graffiti covered walls and strange concrete structures looked like something out of a first person shooter video game. I wasn’t sure if a zombie or alien would pop up from behind the wall. The place really wasn’t scary, at least in the daytime but the lower levels did have an interesting feel to them. I wrote in my Holly blog post that I felt a zen stillness there. Seaholm was more of a study in contrasts. The main level seems like a temple to industry filled with light. The lower level seemed more like a post-apocalyptic bunker, with its massive concrete walls that resembled a bomb shelter.
Going back to the light, I walked up to the second floor that overlooks the generator room. These areas look like they used to be offices. On the south-east corner, there was a light filled space with a view of the new downtown skyline. In the image below, I was able to frame the new 360 condominiums with is the second tallest building in Austin. I like the contrast between the old, roughly textured walls with the light, airily and tall building outside. A contrast between the past and the future? Finally, before ending this photo tour, here are some photographs from the outside of the power plant. The backside of the power plant has several smoke stacks with some associated machinery. Almost none of the metal superstructures that surrounds the Holly plant exists here at Seaholm. A solid concrete path along the roof makes for a nice leading line to the Austin skyline.
The front of the plant has two similar door ways with the a bold sign that reads City of Austin Power. The final photo shows the potential of this place and while there is some urban decay, the structure remains strong and ready for redevelopment. I am looking forward to see how it all turns out. There are some ambitious plans for retail spaces, condos and hotels on the property. A new central library is going to be built right next door with roads and pedestrian walkways that will connect the future Seaholm site with the library and the rest of the downtown. Time will tell if these were just grand plans on paper or the bold continuation of Austin’s downtown renaissance.
My Thought Process
Image 1: This first photograph gives a nice overview of the grand central space. It was taken from the westside looking east towards the wall of lights. You can see the large opening in the floor that once housed the generators.
Image 2: As we started shooting Seaholm, the sunlight streamed in through the large bank of windows on the east. I wanted to document the “hugeness” of the space and the neat layout of the windows. I also wanted capture the sun rays streaming into the space. HDR really helps in this kind of shot since the dynamic range is so broad. I was able to record the rays of light, the details in the sky as well the interior space in a single photograph.
Image 3: I really love this ceiling. The grooves that run from front to back really pulls my eye down the building. I also like the repeating patterns of the pillars, roof supports and windows. I purposely created an interesting wide-angle distortion by angling the lens upward.
Image 4: As I moved towards the back of the building, the shadows increased. I like that bright distant window and the shadows that are creeping around the staircase and pillars.
Image 5: This catwalk is located one level below the main level. I like the leading lines of the catwalk and the large concrete hole that surrounds the space. I increased the texture and color to emphasize the character on the concrete walls.
Image 6: At the lowest level, the light comes in filtered through the various holes and between the walls and pillars. There is a balance between light and shadow which I wanted to capture. However, I think the shadows are more important here and that is ultimately what makes this image interesting.
Image 7: I found this hole in the wall and love the contrast between the wall texture and the view within the opening. The circle was used to frame the scene but the highly textured frame itself is also interesting. Again, HDR was used to its fullest in this photograph — a scene in which a conventional photograph would not be able to render as effectively.
Image 8: This photograph is all about the red glow. However, I also like the color contrast of the light coming from above the stairs and the purplish color in the room to the right. I attempted the balance the stairs on the right with the pillars on the left.
Image 9: I shot a different downtown view through these windows but as I shifted my position, the 360 Condos came into the frame. I decided to simplify the exterior by centering the building in the window. I’m also attracted to the texture of these walls and the light which is bouncing around in the room.
Image 10: I wanted to capture the smokestack and some of the exterior machinery at the back of the plant. The super wide-angle distorts the lines towards the center, which I think, makes it look even taller.
Image 11: The roof of Seaholm has some great view of downtown Austin. I used the concrete walkway to create leading lines toward the skyline.
Image 12: This photograph is the only one in which I did not use HDR. I increased texture to create a feel similar to the other photographs.
[Note: Make sure to click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
I took these photographs with the Canon 7D in RAW with the Sigma 10-20mm lens. I used a tripod for maximum stability and ease of HDR processing. I used Photomatix for HDR creation, Pixelmator for layer blending and Aperture 3 for final sharpening, vignetting and burning and dodging effects.
Images 1,3,4,5,6,10,11: f13, 3 exposures, -2, 0, +2 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 2: f13, 4 exposures, -4,-2, 0, +2 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 7: f8, 4 exposures, -4,-2, 0, +2 exposure compensation, ISO 160 at 10mm
Image 8: f9, 5 exposures, -4,-2, 0, +2,+4 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 9: f13, 3 exposures, -2 2/3,-2/3, 0, +1 1/3 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 12: f8, 3 exposures, 1/320sec, no exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
HDR is a Process, Not a Specific Look
HDR, High Dynamic Range, photography has especially been popular these last several years. It tends to be a polarizing photography topic or technique that either people seem to like or dislike. Making broad generalizations, I find traditional photographers tend not to like it as much while the general public seems to enjoy it more. The point I wanted to make in this blog post is that HDR, while some equate it with a particular look, it really a process or technique. Some maybe surprised to learn that there isn’t one style or look to HDR but there are many variations. HDR photography is the technique of combining multiple images, usually 3 or more photographs taken at different exposures into a single blended image. This is usually done is post-processing though there are some new cameras and even the iPhone that creates HDRs in camera. How these images get combined is part of the skill and artistry and like anything else there are good example and not so good example of this photography technique.
If you have followed my blog or looked at my gallery, you probably know that I use HDR in a bunch of my photographs. While my HDR blending technique has changed a bit over these last couple of years, in general, I tend to have a light touch. I go for a more natural look that does not have super bright colors or heavy textures. This, of course, is my choice. Some choose to dial-up the HDR process to create an image that looks more fanciful. Neither style is correct or incorrect. This is Art after all and it really is up to the artist to execute in the style that they like. The people can decide what artistic execution they personally like better.
I recently went on a tour of the old Holly Street Power Plant, that I wrote about here. One of my fellow HDR photographer friends, Van Sutherland, and I ended up in the control room and shot the photographs above at the same time. He was standing next to me on my left. Although the angle and framing are slightly different, the lighting conditions where identical — it was very dark. I love how, given almost identical conditions, we came up with very different photographs. Much of the difference is due to the HDR processing. This shows how HDR is not a specific look but really a process that people can use to create a look they have in their head. Van does some spectacular HDR photography and I’ve long admired his work. You can see more examples of his work here, on his blog. He has honed his technique over the years to come up with his style. I have also developed a different style over the years. Two styles, very different, both HDR. So if you are already using HDR techniques yourself or want to get into it, I would encourage you to develop your own style. Remember, HDR is merely a process, a way to develop your own look. People who think all HDR looks the same may have not seen the variety that is out there.
Photo Memories of the Holly Street Power Plant
Last week, 6 photographers and I had a rare opportunity to photograph the Holly Street Power Plant. My friend Michael Connell organized this photo opportunity with Austin Energy after an incident that he details here on his blog. The 570 megawatt Plant is located in a residential neighborhood in the east side of town, close to the downtown central business district. It has been operational since the 1960s, primarily using natural gas, and was a significant power source for Austin. Years of controversy and neighborhood opposition finally closed down the plant in 2007 and it is slated for demolition sometime this year. Notwithstanding its tumultuous history, I felt that this was a chance to document a major facility before it is torn down. I’m not a photojournalist, per say, but I felt a bit like one as I spent 2 hours capturing images from both the inside and outside of the facility. Two representatives from Austin Energy, Carlos Cordova and Bobby Gosey were gracious hosts and tour guides. They gave us the history and ins and out of the place and more importantly they were there to keep us safe. Ironically, there is no longer any power at the power plant. There was no electricity to for the lights so all the photographs you see on this post were taken in natural light.
We started our tour in the main generator room. This is the largest and most impressive room and I spend a good part of my time documenting this area. The group split up and while some climbed the exterior catwalks to the top levels of the plant, I decided to stay lower down. I photographed parts of the catwalks and stairs in the exterior skeleton but my interest in architecture pulled me back to the central core. Also, I don’t mind a bit of hight but I definitely did not feel comfortable climbing higher, to the top. With only a hand full of photographers in such as large facility, I felt like, at times, I had the place to myself. There was enough things to see that everyone appeared to focus on their own interest in photography. Some liked closeups of old dials and gauges, others like the rusted pipes and distortion. I had my super-wide lens and wanted to mainly capture the sweeping grandness of the place. There was a zen like silence and stillness to the once noisy plant. Combined with 5 years of dust, dirt and bird droppings, the place was a strange combination of the industrial and urban decay. My goal was the capture the enormity of the place, the neat industrial lines and the stillness that now permeates this once bustling place.
HDR (High Dynamic Range) photography was perfect for the Holly Power Plant and 5 of the 7 photographers on this tour are HDR aficionados. Without any electricity and man-made lighting, it was very dark in places. Long exposures on tripods along with multiple exposures works well for these situations. With HDR, the photographer captures 3 or more images at varying exposures and latter blends these images together with software. It does a great job capturing the range of light that is just not possible with standard photography. HDR also enhances textures so that dust and rust of the plant is accentuated and works well with feel of urban decay. So with tripod in hand, we set out to record bits of the old Holly Power Plant. What you see on this post is my look at this place. I will also add links at the bottom to the other photographers that were part of this most unusual photowalk.
It’s clear that after working 27 years at the Holly Street Plant, Bobby has mixed emotions. I hope these photographs will serve as a reminder of the place he knows well and will disappear in the not to distant future. My thanks to MIke for arranging this event and to the representatives of Austin Energy, Carlos and Bobby in particular, who were both friendly and professional. I feel honored and lucky to be able to preserve a slice of history.
Click here to see all my images from the Holly Street Power Plant. You can also click on each of the photos to see a larger version.
I started out photographing the main generator room. The photo as the top of the blog gives you an idea of the size of the place. The next 5 photos above are my attempts to capture the bits of the room that I found interesting. The supports on the walls and ceilings created great lines that, I thinks works well with the photographs. After my first pass in this room, I climb the stairs to the second level where the control room is located. The first photo in this post is the view from right outside the control room.
The control room was extremely dark. All of the light you see came from the band of windows that you see in the photograph. I mentioned to a fellow photographer that this room and the entire facility itself looks one of those old abandoned Soviet era installations. It’s probably the closest I’ll ever get to an old soviet style industrial complex.
Exit a side door from the control room and you are outside in the superstructure of the plant. The next 3 photos are from this area. There are series of metal catwalks, stairs and an incredible array of valves, pipes and odd technical looking structures. I shot this level and went up another level. This area is probably about 40 or so feet from the ground. The exterior structure went considerably higher and Bobby enthusiastically leading a group of photographer up higher. Not being a fan of heights with open metal catwalks in particular, I decided to stay a bit longer in this area before returning inside.
I took a bunch more photographs of this place and may post more of them in a future, in a part 2.
My Thought Process
Image 1: I wanted to capture a bird’s eye view of the entire generator room. This is about 2/3 the length of the room and was take just out side the control room on the second level catwalk.
Images 2 – 6: All of the scenes were taken in the generator room. In my intro, I mentioned how quiet the place was. The zen stillness put me in a mood to create simple images of this room. A lone control panel, A generator with an open door and a large blank wall. The HDR help me to capture the details and control the light in this enormous room. I really liked the leading lines created by the ceiling beams. I think they add lots of texture and interest to the photos.
Image 7: The control room was the most challenging to take. The room was extremely dark — much darker that the image would suggest. The only source of light were the front windows. I did a three exposure HDR but even at 30 seconds the image still came out dark. I did a 4th exposure in bulb mode where I kept the shutter open for 84 seconds. I later used this bulb exposure as part of the HDR. There is a bit of a ghostly feel to the room with the interesting light. Overall, I’m happy with the way this long exposure HDR came out.
Image 8 – 10 : I generally tend to do mildly processed HDRs but I do make exceptions based on the subject. These 3 photos were processed more aggressively than usual to emphasize the texture. The outside catwalk area was full of rusty old structures and shiny pipes. I knew HDR would make the old things look older and the shiny things look shinier. I think the HDR adds more of the industrial feel to these images. The last image, “Catwalk”, was an experiment where I used 6 photographs to create the HDR instead of my usual 3. I’m not sure if it helped but using additional images in a HDR at times makes the blending easier. These situations with pipes and background sky is always a challenge for HDR processing. Halos or bright areas around the structures near the clouds often results when creating HDRs. I did my best to get ride of these effects and I’m mostly satisfied with the results.
[Note: Make sure to click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
I took these photographs with the Canon 7D in RAW with the Sigma 10-20mm lens. The camera was used on a tripod for maximum stability and ease of HDR processing. I used Photomatix for HDR creation, Pixelmator for layer blending and Aperture 3 for finally sharpening, vignetting and burning and dodging effects.
Images 1,2,3,5,6,8,9: f13, 3 exposures, -2, 0, +2 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 4: f13, 2.5 secs, 0 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 7: f13, 4 exposures, -2, 0, +2 exposure compensation and 84 sec bulb exposure, ISO 100 at 10mm
Image 10: f13, 6 exposures, -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 10mm
Photographs from my Photowalk mates
Here are some photographs taken by the other photographers that were part of this Holly Power Plant photo event.
Michael Connell on Flickr.
Michael Tuuk image 1 and image 2 on Flickr.
Van Sutherland Image 1 and image 2 from Exile Imaging. Van and I shot the control room at the same time. I love how two people can take almost an identical view of the same place and end up with two very different photographs. There is so much creativity and style differences with HDR processing. Compare Van’s processing with mine. Some people believe that there is only one kind of HDR processing. Obviously this is not true.
Dave Wilson image 1 and image 2 and image 3 on Dave Wilson Photography.
Here is Alex Suarez’s blog post with photographs from the event. Alex while knowledgeable in HDR, generally does not use the technique too often. Looks like he made an exception.
And Finally –tradewinds•> image 1 and image 2 on Flickr. As you can tell Tony has a very different style and does not do any HDR photography.
Color, Reflections and Drinks at the Soho Lounge
A few photographer friends and I get together every so often to go on photowalks. We pick a spot in Austin and we go around as a loosely knit group to find something interesting to photograph. These photowalks are part social and part photography. We enjoy each other’s company, share ideas and take photographs for a few hours. East 6th street in downtown Austin is one of the areas we frequent. It’s the best known entertainment district in Austin with 50+ bars, clubs and restaurants in a 7 block stretch between Congress Avenue and Interstate 35. It’s a great place for street photography and capturing the color and lights at night. I must admit thought that when we go to 6th street, we tend to do more socializing than photography. Still, we have a great time and my goal is to get several good shots per night.
The Soho Lounge is currently our favorite bar on 6th street. It occupies a prime area one block from the famous Driskill Hotel. The 6th street area has a bit of a split personality. Earlier in the evening, even on the weekends, many of the bars are not very crowded. They compete vigorously for business and have lower drink prices. Later at night, when all the college kids arrive, the area is packed, they close the street to vehicular traffic and the drink prices go up. This schedule works well for us older photographers. We get there just after dinner time. We get to shoot around the area when it is not packed and have a couple of inexpensive drinks. In the last few outings, the Soho Lounge had one dollar mixed well drinks until 11pm. Perfect! A bunch of us photographers get to shoot the colorful interior and socialize before the place is packed with the younger patrons.
Recently, I’ve been experimenting more with catching reflections of light and color off of various surfaces. One of my usual photowalk friends, Tony, has certainly been an influence. You can see is work on Flickr, where he goes by the name –tradewinds•>. Though his style and mine are different, there are elements of his style that I have incorporated into my images. These light reflections are part of it. I find that bars make nice subjects since they tend to have interesting decorations and lighting. Most tend to be dark and moody which only enhances the color and reflections. Here are a smattering of images from the Soho Lounge taken on a couple of different outings.
My Thought Process
Image 1: I took this photograph at the bar just before Christmas, hence the festive lights. I loved the glow of the holiday lighting as well as the reds and blue of the bar. I made sure to catch the reflections of these lights and their colors. The Sony NEX-5 was shot directly placed on the bar without using a tripod. The lower position gave me the best reflections.
Image 2: I liked the curve of the table and again the reflections bouncing off the surface. The empty dark area between the table and the bar, I believe, nicely adds to the image. I believe I took this one with a table top tripod. When trying to catch reflections, make sure to raise or lower your camera from the reflecting surface to get the greatest effect. The best angle and height of the camera will be different with every scene. Hand holding in this low light is either difficult or degrades the photograph since you need to use a higher ISO. I like to use a small tripod so that I can take the photo at ISO 200, which is the lowest ISO on the Sony.
Image 3: I caught a really nice red, blue and yellow light reflection off a black counter at the back of the bar. I focused on the surface and reflections which left the distant lights softly out of focus. I also tried focusing on the lights and had the reflections out of focus but that version did not work as well. I’ve noticed that the best focus point varies on the scene and your taste. Try taking the photograph both ways to see which you like better. I used a small aperture to make sure I get the entire counter in focus. At this close distance, a larger aperture will focus on a very shallow depth of field and I would have missed part of the counter’s texture. I also think the shadows and the negative space enhances this photograph.
Image 4: Finally, I included a shot from the outside of the bar. You can see the Soho Lounge sign completes with all the other bars for attention — there are a lot of bars on 6th street! I took this with a table top tripod place on the sidewalk, again to get the best quality and an interesting angle. If you follow my blog, you will noticed that I’ve used this lower vantage point quite a bit.
[Note: Click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
I took these photographs with the Sony NEX-5 in RAW with the 16mm prime lens. I minimally post processed them using Aperture 3, sharpening, brightening and increasing color saturation.
Image 1: f8, 6 secs, +1 exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 16mm
Image 2: f2.8, .5 sec, no exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 16mm
Image 3: f10, 8 secs, no exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 16mm
Image 4: f6.3, .8 sec, no exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 16mm
Finding Artistry in a Rare Austin Snow
We had a rare Austin snow event today. You can’t really call it a snow storm since it was only about an inch of snow. However, this is Austin, Texas and an inch of the white stuff can shut down the city. To the great joy of my kids, school was cancelled. I didn’t get any more sleep than a regular day, the kids where hankering to get out and play. I broke out the Canon 7D and decided to take some snow scenes of the house. Then when all the neighborhood kids started running around, I got some action shots of the impromptu snow battles. After everything settled down and the kids finished their first round of play, I decide to create a bit more artistic snow images. The sun was finally out and the snow was starting to disappear so I did a quick walk around the neighborhood to see what I can find.
I’ve blogged a lot about my Sony NEX-5 recently that it was nice to break out my “big” camera. It was fun using several lenses this morning. I started with the Sigma 10-20mm super wide-angle to capture the snow scenes around the house on tripod. It was dark and I did 1 minute long bulb exposures to capture the ambient light reflecting off the snow. Then I switched to the 35mm f2 to get some portraits of my kids in the snow, it was still early in the morning and I needed a fast lens with a big aperture. I used the 18-135 zoom to capture the kids and the dogs running around in the street. Finally I turned to my 50mm f1.4 to stimulate my artistic, creative side. Its been a while since I used this lens and the shallow depth of field was something I have missed while using the NEX-5.
I didn’t have a plan. I just walked around for about 30 minutes to see if I can capture some images of the neighborhood snow. It didn’t shoot much. Some images worked, others didn’t. The 3 presented on this blog post are my favorite artistic snow scenes. I converted them to black and white to, arguably enhance their artistic feel. I hope you like them.
My Thought Process
Image 1: You can tell the snow is thin and the tire tracks left these dark patterns against the asphalt. I liked the pattern of the tire tracks with the texture of ice and snow. It was hard to find a clean set of tracks since several cars and people have already passed through these streets. I found this branching design that seemed like it would work. I cropped the left side to eliminate some distractions and the black and white conversion further simplified and unified the image. It all about the texture and pattern. There was minimal post processing. Just some sharpening, some brightening the mid-tones and the crop.
Image 2: Down a the community park, I wanted to capture a broader scene of snow and nature. The park which is usually picturesque had some temporary construction fencing that prevented me from getting the sweeping vistas. I settled for this scene of trees. I liked the little mound of snow and the bark texture of the foreground tree. Unfortunately there is a lot of distractions from all the branches that surrounds this wooded area. I used post processing to burn (darken) and future blur the background trees to make them less distracting. The main tree was also dodged (brightened) to make it stand out. I cropped the left side to simply the composition. All post processing was done in Aperture 3.
Image 3: This image represents another kind of track, created by a child, and not a car. I think the image is interesting but my least favorite out of the 3 images. I probably should have found a bolder foot step imprint. Showing a path of steps might also work but it is certainly cliché. What makes this a bit different, perhaps, is the bits of grass in black that really stands outs against the white. I think there is a bit of softness and delicacy in this photograph compared to the first two. It may, however, arguably lack a strong focal point. A bit of an experiment, something different for me. I used a healing brush to reduce some of the distracting darker spots in the snow. The image was sharpened, the definition increased and a vignette was added.
[Note: Click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
I took the photographs in RAW with the Canon 7D with the 50mm f1.4 lens. There were post processed using Aperture 3. I used the black and white conversion built into the Aperture to create these photographs. Post processing varies but is described above.
Image 1: f2.2, 1/2500 sec, no exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 50mm
Image 2: f2.2, 1/1250 sec, +1/3 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 50mm
Image 3: f2.2, 1/3200 sec, +1/3 exposure compensation, ISO 100 at 50mm
A Magical Black and White from the Ordinary
Magical? Maybe, maybe not. I guess it’s up to you to decide, however, this photograph more than any other so far has convinced me of the merits of black and white photography. I am not going to abandon color for a pure monochrome existence but I’m enjoying the simplicity of this form of photography. The original image was a throwaway. Something I took, experimented with and almost rejected. I took several frames in the same spot and this one was the best, nevertheless, the image in color did not look compelling enough for me. Not good enough to use as my daily post on Flickr. On a whim, I did a black and white conversion. It looked promising. I did some more post-processing tweaks and I came up with something I liked. Feedback from this Flickr post was encouraging — many people also seem to like the image. I know the Flickr community has the nicest people and they tend to say nice things in general but there seemed to be more interest than usual for this image. That got me thinking. Why do I and some others like this photograph so much?
I analyzed the photograph more than usual. Why do I like the black and white version, while I was about to throw away the color image? Take a look at the original below — the same composition and framing, of course. The main problem with it in hindsight is that it is too busy — too colorful. There are white, yellow and red light streaks that dominate the picture. There is the blue sky and the yellow street lights — the bright street light in the top left corner is particularly distracting. Beyond the colors, there are all the details that in buildings, the windows, the parked cars that just seems to add noise and confusion to the frame. Now, take a look at the black and white version, again. With the lack of color, all the confusing lights blend together into a consistent white which greatly simplifies the photograph. The building details are also diminished as well as the other elements on the street. With this simplification, other elements become more noticeable. I particularly enjoy the light reflecting off the street and the street texture that it uncovers. The buildings become somewhat more abstract with varying geometric shapes that act as a background to the white light streaks. The entire character of the photograph has changed from a jumbled image of color to one of light, shadow, texture and geometric shapes. That’s why I think its works better in black and white.
Of course the photograph is far from perfect. I can think of several things that can improve this image. If the photograph was even simpler, it might be even more eye-catching. The branches on the left are distracting. The cars on the street add to the clutter underneath the light streak. And while the building details are diminished, I wonder how it would look if most or all the details were erased. Would having black geometric silhouettes make the image better? It may appear more abstract. Maybe that would be better or maybe just different.
What do you think?
Click on the images to see a larger version.
My Thought Process
I took several photographs from the same area. I moved my camera slightly to try to get the best composition. I wanted the light streaks and the street to act as leading lines that would direct the eye down into the photograph. I waned to highlight the tall building and make sure there was sort of a balance between the buildings and the trees on the left. The tall building called the Austonian is a luxury condominium and is the tallest structure in Austin. It has become the newest landmark and I wanted to prominently showcase it in my photograph.
Long exposure light trails are easy to do with a tripod. I usually use the camera’s self-timer to reduce camera shake even when using a tripod. Just pressing the shutter can introduce some shake. A two second delay with the self-timer ensures a clean shot. The exposure was only 8 seconds long which means I had to time when the traffic would pass through my frame. I wanted to get long light streaks and between the self timer and the speed of the traffic, there is a bit of guessing and re-tries required to get a decent light streak. The shape of the light streak itself is all luck — it all depends on the type of vehicle that passes through. From this low angle, it’s nice to get different size vehicles to create a more elaborate light pattern. The relatively uniform hight of cars makes a pure car based light streak boring. Luckily, in this photograph, a truck passed by which added the thin lines above the primary thick lines.
[Note: Click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
The photograph was taken in RAW with the Sony NEX-5 with the 16mm kit lens. The photograph was post processed using Aperture 3 and I used built-in black and white conversion adjustment. The sharpness and definition were increased and I added a vignette and slightly increased contrast to add more shadow around the edges.
Image 1 & 2: f16, 8 secs, +1 exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 16mm
Color vs. Black and White, a Change in Emphasis
Last Thursday, after an Austin SMUG (sponsored by SmugMug) photography lecture, I spent some time making photographs. The monthly lecture takes place as the AT&T Executive Conference Center on the University of Texas campus. The facility is part hotel and part lecture halls and is decorated in an upscale, tasteful corporate look. I had my trusty Sony NEX-5 and I wanted to capture some of the details of this place. Near the front desk there were some small round tables each with a single flower. I like the simplicity and I attempted to capture the zen minimalism of the design.
Each table was spot lit which warmly highlighted the pink flower and amber vase while the surrounding area was relatively dark. I framed the flower so that the background would remain dark and the light would fall off just beyond the flower. I was satisfied with the image I created and posted it to Flickr a couple of days ago. I really liked the warm color and how the pink of the flower and the amber glass seem to almost blend together to form a single complete object. Then today, just on a whim, I converted this image to black and white. The character of the photograph changed of course, but I still liked the image, but for different reasons. The bright white of the flower now decouples it from the supporting container, which now mostly blends into the background. The emphasis shifts from the warmth of the flower and vase to the geometric shape of the now almost levitating flower. I also think the mood of the images shifts from warmth and harmony to one of starkness where the flower becomes the star and everything else takes on a supporting role. Interesting that just the removal of color changes the image so much — at least for me and my interpretation. Perhaps, I’m over-analyzing the photographs but I’m taken by the difference an absence of color can create.
This little exercise also taught me that I should play more with black and white. I am generally attracted to color when creating my photographs but maybe experimenting with black and white, even in post processing, will train my brain to look at more shapes. I’ve attempted to incorporate more shadows and negative space into my exposures. Seeing beyond color and looking for shapes, I believe, can ultimately help strengthen my overall images whether they have color or not.
So which image do you like better?
Make sure to click on the photograph to see a larger version.
My Thought Process
Image 1: As I mentioned above, I was initially attracted by the color and warmth of the flower, vase and the setting. I wanted to emphasize the simplicity of the table centerpiece so I wanted to exclude all details from the background. When framing, I shifted my position to make sure I did not get any lights and reflections in the background. I also reduced the exposure to show more details of the flower and to make sure that the background will be as dark as possible. I like how the light on the table goes a bit past the flower and then drops off into total darkness while the well-lit flower nicely contrasts against the black. I also made sure the flower was not dead center in the frame. I used a small table top tripod to ensure maximum sharpness and highest quality. The tripod allowed me to shoot at ISO 200 at 1/10 of a second.
Image 2: This image was created totally in post processing using Aperture 3′s black and white setting.
[Note: Click on the images for a larger version]
Image Details
The photograph was taken in RAW with the Sony NEX-5 with the 18-55mm kit lens. Both photographs were post processed using Aperture 3. I used the black and white conversion built into the Aperture to create the second photograph. The sharpness and brightness were increased on both and the color saturation and vibrancy was increased on image 1.
Image 1: f4.5, 1/10 sec, -1 exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 18mm
Image 1: f4.5, 1/10 sec, -1 exposure compensation, ISO 200 at 18mm


















































































































