Call me unsophisticated in art and architecture but I expected something different when I visited the Chicago Architecture Biennial last December. Chicago, you see, is one of the great cities for architecture in the U.S., the birthplace of the skyscraper and home to Frank Lloyd Wright, one of America’s greatest architects. I noticed this event as I photographed the downtown streets. An architectural exhibit in a great architectural city, how wonderful.
I was expecting an intellectual yet understandable presentation of architectural trends. Perhaps a history of old to new Chicago. An exploration of design from a variety of global styles. What I found appeared to be theoretical and beyond my comprehension. It was like architecture as art in the most bizarre way. It reminded me of why I tend to dislike art museums in general. Too much theory divorced from reality.
Call me overly pragmatic. Too literal or too closed minded. I like innovation and creativity within certain parameters. My disappointment in the exhibit, however, was offset by its magnificent venue. The Chicago Cultural Center, originally the city’s central library, unfolded its richness as I climbed the stairs. The exhibits fell away, dominated by the container, rather than the contents.
I’m not necessarily a fan of ornate, old-world architecture. I appreciate simple and pragmatic forms. A well proportioned modern structure may delight me just as much. However, I found this building particularly beautiful and exquisitely maintained. It’s the kind of structure you don’t see in an overgrown frontier town like Austin. No, this is old world lavishness when vast sums were spent on city infrastructure.
I shot all photos with my Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II, which uncharacteristically, was the only camera I brought on my trip. The Olympus 9-18mm compact wide-angle lens was the perfect companion. All were shot hand-held at 1/10 to 1/25 of a second. The in-body image stabilization and wide-angle allowed me to slow down the shutter and thus lower the ISO. Consequently, none of the images were over ISO 1250, which kept the image quality high.
The micro 4/3 sensor gives me greater depth of field, which works well for these subjects. Would a full-frame camera work better? I’m not convinced, especially handheld and at these slow shutter speeds.
I often shoot dead on to my subject and attempt a symmetrical composition. You see that in several of these shots and I find them extremely challenging to frame. Easy in concept, of course, but tough for me to master. To do these properly, you need to be perfectly level, perfectly perpendicular to the subject and frame symmetrically. Doing this without a tripod makes it more difficult, not because of the shutter speed, rather, getting the minute 3D positioning correct.
Architectural perfection like this begs for perfect framing. Something that I didn’t achieve but hopefully beautiful nevertheless.
I’m going on a quick trip to Madison, Wisconsin and Chicago and I need to figure out what camera to bring. With all the cameras I own it can be fun and daunting to narrow down the selection. I often bring two, sometimes 3 cameras. I decided to go light this time, reducing one potential headache of holiday travel.
It took me a couple of days to think things over. There are so many thing I like to shoot and the challenge of having so much gear is that there’s always a better camera for specific purposes. If left unchecked, it’s easy to bring a slew of cameras which somewhat negates the benefit of small and light mirrorless systems.
I have a few new cameras that I haven’t talked about, which I will reveal next year. It was tempting to bring my newest toys but I opted to take just the Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II. My main lens, the super-wide and super-light Olympus 9 – 18mm f4-5.6. This should be perfect for Chicago architecture. I’m also bringing the tiny Panasonic 14mm f2.5 prime for lower light situations. Finally, the 40-150mm telephoto for compressing some architectural details.
That’s the great thing about micro 4/3 and the slower (non-pro) lenses. They are so light, the 3 lens set plus the camera body only weighs 2 pounds. That gives me a 18 to 36mm and 80mm to 300mm range with uncompromising image quality.
Of course, I’ll have one more camera with me — the ever popular iPhone. For many people, that’s the only camera they need. The photograph above, I shot that last year with an iPhone 5. That’s already 3 generations old. The latest iPhone 6s, I’m sure, is even better.
I went on my first ever landscape photography trip to Big Bend last week. I mentioned that I was bringing 5 cameras — actually 6, if you include the iPhone 5S. Understandably, people thought I was crazy. I had my doubts too. But it worked out pretty good as did the other non-camera gear I recently bought.
The hiking boots are fantastic and especially helped in those rocky places. The Thinktank camera bag was comfortable and my back thanked me. Though the weather nixed our longest planned hike, I held up well after two 2 mile hikes on Friday. 20 pounds, which seemed moderately heavy on the way out, felt light on the way home. Looks like this hiking thing is a good strength training exercise.
So how did all those cameras work out? Not bad. I used every camera I brought. Some more than others, as you can see.
|Pentax Q7||3093 photos|
|Olympus OM-D E-M10||720 photos|
|Canon 6D||624 photos|
|Apple iPhone 5S||111 photos|
|Nikon 35Ti||68 photos (1.84 rolls)|
|Mamiya 645E||60 photos (4 rolls)|
The star of the show was the Pentax Q7. I carried the camera along with 3 lenses in my small Domke bag which I brought everywhere. It was my go to camera and I shot both landscapes and candids during the trip. The big backpack and the tripod stayed in the trunk and was only used during our hikes and longer stops. For quick jaunts and in car shooting, it was the Q7 all the way.
I shot a large number of black and whites which I thought worked especially well. Something about the pointy plants and textured rocks in the desert that really works well in monochrome. I’m glad because while the Q7 black and white street photos in Japan worked well, I wasn’t sure how the style would translate in America.
I didn’t photograph with the Nikon 35Ti as much as I thought — I didn’t quite finish two rolls. Part of the reason is that I was shooting with so many cameras. There wasn’t much of a weight penally, though. and the 35Ti and the Pentax Q7 kit both fit conveniently in that Domke bag. I got back the first roll and the photos, especially the color, looked great.
The medium format Mamiya 645E, on the other hand, got more use than expected. 60 photos doesn’t sound like a lot, compared to digital, but considering that each shutter press costs between $1.25 and $1.80, it adds up quickly. Because taking pictures with film, especially medium format, costs real money, I’m naturally more selective. But looking at those landscapes through a giant glass viewfinder was heavenly.
I shot the Mamiya meticulously which is in stark contrast to the quick, rapid fire grab shots I make with the Pentax Q7. It was fun shooting both ways. Which method creates better photographs? Now that’s a good question.
With little risk, I took more chances with the digital Q7 which sometimes creates surprisingly compelling images. There are more throwaways, of course, but there is a sense of playfulness and experimentation. The Mamiya is more like Zen meditation. I contemplate that image and will it into existence with the loud clack of the shutter and the satisfying tactile feel of advancing the film to the next frame. The images are not daring enough though. The fear of “wasting” money prevents me from taking chances with my 645 imagery.
I shot the Canon 6D more like the medium format camera and used a tripod and took brackets (3 shots) for HDR. I slowed down and look carefully throughout the frame, scrutinizing the composition more than ever before — even with no risk of wasted money. My desire for the quick digital captures are satisfied by the Q7. The 6D became a serious landscape camera. You can see my Canon 6D HDR handiwork at the top of the post.
The iPhone held its own and did well in service of creating Instagrams. My Instagram uploads were squeezed in during the short and sparse cell and WiFi coverage. Thanks to the blog readers who follow me on Instagram. They got to see an early preview of the places I’ve been.
Finally, I used the Olympus E-M10 for a very specific reason, which I’ll go into, in a future post. It was a high-tech feature which wowed some of my fellow photographers. Better photographs through technology! That said, I was the only one with film cameras so I embraced old and new tech equally, I suppose.
I got back from my first excursion to Big Bend last night, actually right during the Super Bowl. No worries, I’m more interested in photography than football. It was a good trip and this city boy made it safely though 5 days in the country.
The weather was better than expected but we still had a fair amount of overcast or uninspiring skies. Ironically, the best sunset occurred on the way back home. I shot these photos out the back of the minivan as we passed through San Antonio, Texas. Beautiful skies to be sure, but we all wished that we got something like this out in Big Bend — mountain silhouettes are usually more inspiring than overpasses. But of course, I’m usually an urban photographer so perhaps it’s just fate.
Therein lies the challenge with landscape photography, of course. You have no control of the weather and not much control over the light. Composition maybe the only saving grace but that only goes so far. So on my first serious landscape photography trip, I learned to make do with whatever I had. It was a fun time and I’ll certainly talk about the details over the next bunch of posts.
I’m going to the country. This may not be a big deal for most, but for me, it’s a momentous occasion. You see, I was born in New York City and lived mostly in big cities. Actually, Austin is one of the smaller places I’ve lived. When my family goes on vacation, we go to larger urban areas to recharge.
My situation is a source of endless fun for my friends. After all, I’ve never been camping, never been on a horse and never done other typical outdoorsy activities. Not to say I haven’t lived life though. I ask my nature-loving friends if they’ve ever ridden on the outside of a subway train before. Well anyway, that’s back when I was in high school and they frown upon outdoor train riding in NYC now.
I’m going to Big Bend National Park, all the way on the South Western end of Texas near the border with Mexico. A photography expedition and a workshop of sorts. My friend Alex Suarez is leading it. Between him and the other participants, we have a lot of experienced people and a total of 8. It will take at least 7 hours, not including food and rest stops.
It’s been interesting preparing for it, mainly the non-photography gear. I’ve gone to REI more than I ever have, picking up comfortable hiking boots and assorted knickknacks. So, I’m going to a desert in the dry season in a middle of a drought and the forecast says it’s going to rain? Are you kidding me? Back to REI for some weatherproof pants.
I even “invested” in a new camera backpack too. A nice Thinktank Streetwalker Pro which seems perfect for the gear I plan to bring. When I travel on planes and through cities, I go light with a small messenger style bag and mirrorless cameras. This trip is different. We’re going by car (minivan actually) and it’s going to be packed to the gills with everyone’s photo gear. We’re supposed to be hiking too, which got me a little concerned. Remember that bit about never being in the country?
I’m going to say it right here, before the trip, that my gear selection might be a colossal mistake. But, I’m doing it. I’m taking 5 cameras! Crazy right? I know. And not all of them are the small mirrorless variety.
First up, I’m bringing my Canon 6D with the 24-105mm f4 lens. It’s my highest quality digital camera and I’m going to use it for landscapes. I also have an old manual focus Tokina 19 – 35mm which I’ll use for night, wide-angle shooting. Big Bend is supposed to have the darkest skies in the continental U.S., I want to shoot the Milky Way. Oh, did I mention that I’ve only seen the Milky Way once or twice in my life? Stargazing in NYC, not good.
I said in my previous post that I’m getting into Medium Format Film. So, I’m also taking my Mamiya 645E with 3 prime lenses. I now have a 55mm, a 80mm and a 150mm. In 35mm terms, they equate to a 35mm, 50mm and 93mm focal lengths. I’m really curious how medium format film compares to my full frame (digital) Canon 6D. How are the colors? The detail? I think Big Bend will be a wonderful landscape test for both cameras.
I’m also bringing my Nikon 35Ti compact film camera. I get to shoot it along side the big film camera — with the same film. Kodak Portra 400, which I always use and Fujifilm Velvia 100 slide film, which I’ve never shot. Slide film is more challenging than negative film so I’ll see how that goes.
I’m taking my ultra compact Pentax Q7 system with 3 lenses. I’ll have the 40mm equivalent prime but also the 18 – 28mm and 70 – 210mm equivalent zoom lenses. The entire system weighs a mere 1 pound. Ironically, I’m going to have the most reach and flexibility with the lightest system. It will be fun to document the trip and I might even use it for landscapes.
Finally, I’m bringing the Olympus OM-D E-M10. Charles from Olympus let me use it along with the wide-angle lens. I’m going to do something special with it, which I’ll talk about after the trip. It will be neat if it actually works.
So there you have it. My crazy kit for my first ever landscape excursion. I won’t hike with all my gear but with tripod and water, the backpack is still going to be 20 pounds. Much more than I’m used to carrying since I’m usually a light and nimble mirrorless guy. We’ll see. As I get tired, I might shed gear on subsequent hikes.
Wish me luck, I should be back Sunday.