A tale of two churches with two cameras, the Olympus E-PM2 and Fuji X100S

Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Basilica of St. Nicholas – Amsterdam, Netherlands

I visited two magnificent churches in Amsterdam. Both beautiful in their own way and both very different. So different, in fact, that I shot them in distinct ways with my two cameras.

What’s a trip to Europe without shooting some of these wonderfully ornate structures. I had my Olympus E-PM2 with a wide-angle lens for this purpose and luckily both places seemed fine with me using a tripod. I also shot my Fujifilm X100S but in a different way. I knew the 35mm equivalent lens on the X100S would not capture the entirely of the place. Rather, my purpose with that camera was to concentrate on details.

Basilica of St. Nicholas

First up is the Basilica of St. Nicholas, the major Catholic church in the middle of the old historic core. It’s an easy walk from the Amsterdam Centraal train station. I’ve shot a fair number of interiors over the years and this place was one of the most challenging. The inside is dim with its dark-colored stonework and stained glass windows. How do you capture the beauty of the dark walls while still maintaining the color and delicate translucency of the windows? With HDR of course, but with a lot more exposures than normal.

Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands

In almost every case, my HDRs are created from just 3 exposures, usually 0ev, -2ev and +2ev. Here I shot 12 exposures ranging from -4.7ev to +1.7 ev. I cherry picked 4 exposures that gave me a decent range, -2.7ev, -1.7ev, -0.3ev and +1.7ev. I needed this to get the effect you see — the glorious detail in both the windows and walls. Our eyes and brain seamlessly merge these details but cameras struggle with dynamic range. Advanced HDR techniques are required to simulate what human beings do so well.

Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands

I knew taking a single photo with the Fuji was not going to do this place justice. After all, it takes a tripod and multiple exposures on the Olympus to do a half way decent job. Rather, I decided to strategically shoot images that had less dynamic range. Whether you have a smartphone or the fanciest DSLR, here, you might be disappointed with the results. Selectively shooting details might work well photographically but it hardly gives a feel of the entire church. St. Nicholas is a tough place to take great photos.

Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Basilica of St. Nicholas - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Oude Kerk

My second stop, Oude Kerk (Old Church) couldn’t be more different. Originally a Catholic church when founded 700 years ago, by 1578 it became Calvinist. Photographically, Oude Kerk is much easier. With light colored walls and with little stained glass, the dynamic range was manageable. While I started taking HDRs like I usually do, I soon realized that the Fuji X100S could also do an adequate job if I properly nailed the exposure.

Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Shooting the details here was more enjoyable than St. Nicholas, primarily because I could do a better job. HDR wasn’t required and I could concentrate on framing handheld rather than futzing with a tripod. While I’ve become quite adept at using the 3 legged appendage, I still find it cumbersome. Shooting free form with the Fuji, for me, is a purer photographic experience.

Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Oude Kerk charged 5 Euros for entry but I felt it was worth it. The place was less crowded than St. Nicholas and I felt less rushed. At St. Nicholas, I was unsure if I was allowed to use a tripod and the steady stream of visitors forced me to work quicker. The peaceful white walls of the Old Church put me in a Zen state of mind. I took my time to frame my photos, both on and off the tripod. Ironically, this church is located right in the middle of Amsterdam’s famous Red Light District. The contrast between the external environment and the internal sanctuary couldn’t be more different.

Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Old Church was larger and more open. I used the Fuji to capture the sense of scale by including people. The airiness of the place is its main attraction. For sheer detail and color, St. Nicholas impresses but capturing it photographically is a challenge. Using HDR might be the only way to approximate its grandeur.

As usual, knowing your gear and its limits are essential. Learning advanced techniques helps too in tough situations. Even though I only had two cameras and two fixed lenses, I felt satisfied that I captured the essence of both places.

Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands
Oude Kerk - Amsterdam, Netherlands

Please support this blog by clicking on my Amazon Link before buying anything.

10 thoughts on “A tale of two churches with two cameras, the Olympus E-PM2 and Fuji X100S

  1. you did a great job here Andy! I was in both earlier this week and agree that St Nicholas is much more challenging to shoot – but both are beautiful in their own way – nice series here!

  2. Great shots.

    I’m wondering how you’re actually processing the HDR shots as they look very natural. My gut instinct is that you’re layering them on top of each other and masking parts from each layer.

    I’m probably way off though 🙂

    1. I use Photomatix software for the initial HDR blending but depending on the image, like these church images, I do some extra layer blending.

  3. Great job. I’ve never made peace with my tripod. I’m not sure I ever will. I’m considering getting a monopod. At least if I don’t use that for the camera, I can use it as a walking stick!

    1. Tripod can be a pain but really good for high quality, low light photography. Monopods don’t interest me as much since I still get HDR alignment problems with Monopods.

  4. I’ve been looking at these on-and-off for some time now and the impression I get is that the Fuji keeps coming up a bit short in overall image quality when compared to the Olympus. Maybe it’s time needed to adapt to the camera, its sensor, and optimal processing. Maybe it’s a function of the amount of magnification I use / don’t use in viewing. Maybe I’m all wet. What’s your thought at this point? In addition to these samples, I keep thinking back to the series done during your DC area trip. Those interiors done with the Olympus-plus-wide-angle-converter were stunningly good.

    1. Michael, Interesting that you think so. I actually find that the details, sharpness, dynamic range and high ISO performance to be superior on the Fuji X100S. The colors are different and I haven’t decided which I like better. In general, I think the warmer tones look better on the Olympus while the blues, greens and purples look better on the Fuji.

      Comparing these Olympus and Fuji photos here is a bit like comparing Apples and Oranges, actually. The Olympus images are shot on tripod, with a deep depth of field and they are HDRs. The look extremely sharp, with a lot of detail, and great dynamic range mainly because of the HDR processing and tripod usage. If I compare single shots from both, I would put the Fuji ahead image quality wise, most of the time. But the Olympus has other advantages over the X100S like its versatility and faster performance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s